| Viewing Single Post From: No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site | |
|---|---|
| Mick | Mar 12 2009, 10:48 PM |
|
This link; http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/specialreports/oneyearlater/s_90857.html has slightly more detail than the one you provided. Neither link says no fuel was found in the soil or ground water, just that it was safe. More details are needed before we can say if there was fuel contamination there or not. Do you consider the statements by Miller in your link that he identified remains to be suitable evidence that Flight 93 crashed there?
It is quite likely that most of the fuel was burned in the large fireball shown in Val McClatchey's photo. What did not burn may have evaporated before samples were taken leaving only trace amounts that were within levels deemed to be safe. I have not been able to find more specific data so far though.
I'm not surprised that a large amount of fuel can burn very quickly if it is subjected to the severe shock of a high speed crash.
I'm certain anything in the fireball or nest to the flames was consumed. It is not surprising that a high speed crash could eject flammable debris from the scene before it could be heated enough to burn. |
![]() |
|
| No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site · Investigate 9/11 | |




6:17 PM Dec 7