| Viewing Single Post From: No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site | |
|---|---|
| swingdangler | Mar 11 2009, 12:32 PM |
|
1. Great article Shoe. 2. Hamba-how far,wide, and deep would you estimate dispersal with a near vertical impact with the ground? The fuel would have taken considerable time to burn up, not result in a mushroom cloud appearance. All evidence points to the mushroom cloud picture as being faked. This can not be taken as evidence. See pictures of historical crash scenes for the behavior of jet fuel upon ignition. The first people on the scene should have been viewing a large black asymmetrical cloud rising in the air as the fuel burned off overtime. Here is about 1000 gallons burning: FAA Example Another example from Russia From Russia Now add 4-5000 more gallons and you understand why people question the Shanksville evidence. |
![]() |
|
| No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site · Investigate 9/11 | |




11:52 AM Dec 1