JFK

Mar 10 2009, 02:31 PM

bryan26

Mar 10 2009, 02:27 PM

JFK

Mar 10 2009, 10:38 AM

bryan26

Mar 10 2009, 09:35 AM

noeffects

Mar 9 2009, 09:38 PM

bravo Aldo ! good post.

Not a great post. How can you categorically say no one saw the poles getting hit? You have not talked to every witness? Once again all witnesses whos statements support the plane hitting the pentagon are soc witnesses. The Citgo is not proof positive one way or the other. All physical evidence and workers in and out who collected debris and saw evidence are soc witnesses. There are way more soc witnesses than noc witnesses. You choose to focus on the Citgo, because you know most won't know anything about it. Then you go on a rant about no witness said soc. That is not investigation, it is manipulation. You choose to omit all physical evidence with a blanket statement but can't show that it was planted or faked. If it was planted or faked, you should be able to show at least one senario as to how it could have been done, or it is not possible. The cab had to be damaged before 9:38am 9/11 or it was struck by the light pole as reported. Is it possible that that damaged cab was placed in its place after the explosion, with debris and all? The flyover is impossible. You hang on people's statements but ignor the laws of the natural world. Which are more accurate, a person's perception or what is possible in the natural world? Use your brain and not your heart. There are no stationary explosives that can replicate the damage at the pentagon in one big explsosion. The trailor, the debris parts, the internal damage, the damage to three rings, etc. Something hit from the outside in.

And you have not talked to any witnesses.

I don't need to. By your logic nothing ever happens, unless we are able to personally talk to all witnesses, and see all evidence.

And by your logic anything that the government or Main Stream Media says must be true.

< Where are those WMD's >