Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: If Not Plane Or Missle.......What?
Aldo Marquis CIT
Member Avatar

espresso
Mar 10 2009, 01:06 PM


Quote:
 
I'll concede when each of your eyewitnesses agrees that due to their claim that the plane was north of the citgo (or over the annex) they understand that impact is impossible and furthermore reject their impact claims.


And that is what makes you a traitor your country or an enemy of mine, "espresso". They understand, as we've explained to you about Sgt Brooks for instance. Their belief or fear inaccepting or not accepting the inevitable and the obvious has NOTHING to do with the evidence. All of them stand by the north side flight path and would testify to it. If they missed the flyover, WHICH THEY OBVIOUSLY DID, then they can't testify to something they didn't see. You are moving the goal posts and you know it. Why don't you concede that they stand by where they saw plane and they understand where the light poles are at which implicates Lloyd and the US Gov't????

Quote:
 
As to the witnesses I presented... just stating "they deduced it" is handwaving away the evidence. For example


Afework Hagos
“It hit some lampposts on the way in.”

"Yup, he drove, walked past, or saw images of the light poles on the ground and DEDUCED that it "hit some lampposts on the way in".

You assume that he must have deduced impact...where is your source/evidene for this?


I can handwave, because A. I proved where the plane actually flew-north of the Citgo and B. I have proven that witnesses deduced light poles being struck and had to have because the plane approached on the north side of the Citgo!!!

Where is YOUR source/evidence that HE ACTUALLY DID see a plane on SoC while it "hit some lampposts on the way in"???????????????????????

You make me sick, wasting everyone's time.
Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Mar 10 2009, 02:08 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
If Not Plane Or Missle.......What? · Skeptics