| Viewing Single Post From: If Not Plane Or Missle.......What? | |
|---|---|
| espresso | Mar 10 2009, 01:06 PM |
|
I'll concede when each of your eyewitnesses agrees that due to their claim that the plane was north of the citgo (or over the annex) they understand that impact is impossible and furthermore reject their impact claims. As to the witnesses I presented... just stating "they deduced it" is handwaving away the evidence. For example Afework Hagos “It hit some lampposts on the way in.” "Yup, he drove, walked past, or saw images of the light poles on the ground and DEDUCED that it "hit some lampposts on the way in". You assume that he must have deduced impact...where is your source/evidene for this? |
![]() |
|
| If Not Plane Or Missle.......What? · Skeptics | |




9:46 AM Nov 30