Viewing Single Post From: Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane

Viewing Single Post From: Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane
Aldo Marquis CIT	Mar 5 2009, 05:05 PM
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	espresso Mar 5 2009, 04:40 PM Aldo Marquis CIT Feb 27 2009, 04:38 PM Quote: Obviously what I saw happened, therefore the conclusions made by people who didnt see it can be flawed...I accept the fact that there can be miscalculations on my part, but NOT whether or not the plane was on the North or South side of the gas station." ~Sgt William Lagasse after watching The PentaCon and responding to the ASCE (and ultimately Pseudoskeptics) So Sgt Lagasse knows about the implications of the what he saw and he stands by it. How do you feel about this skeptics? He had a chance to back out of it and he didn't. Did he "back out" of his claim that the plane hit the Pentagon? or does he stand by that claim as well? I don't know why don't you ask him Jrefer? Or maybe you can tell us how the plane APPROACHED FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF THE GAS STATION, hit the light poles, showed up low and level across the lawn as seen in the gate cam video, hit the fence/gen trailer with it's right wing/engine, and skimmed into the first floor causing the directional damage leading the C ring hole as outlined by the ASCE. Are you saying the plane can do all that after approaching from the north side of the Citgo?
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08

Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane · Skeptics