Viewing Single Post From: There Was No Missile At the Pentagon

Viewing Single Post From: There Was No Missile At the Pentagon
MIHOP	Mar 4 2009, 02:20 PM
Posts: 5 Group: Members Member #917 Joined: 11/02/08	JackD Mar 4 2009, 01:39 PM I could understand Jim Hoffman's worries in 2002 or 2003, that the Pentagon situation might be set up as a 'honey pot' and eventually be used to discredit the truth movement as a whole. However, in light of the 2005-2009 'new data' -- it is hard to defend that sort of worry anymore. jim did good work analyzing WTC data. someone should send him PentaCon data. He already knows about CIT's work. He calls The PentaCon a "hoax-promoting" video and refuses to defend that characterization. http://www.911review.com/disinfo/videos.html Here he calls NOC/flyover a "No-Plane Theory" and implies that it is not supported by "real evidence": http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/911mysteries/911weknow.html http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/media/nptimeline.html Here he promotes Arabesque's disinfo "rebuttal" to The PentaCon (he promotes it on the "hoax" page as well): http://911research.wtc7.net/resources/web/pentagon.html See Crag's Rebuttal to that dishonest hitpiece here: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=48&st=0& CIT has challenged Hoffman to a debate and he refuses to even respond: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=32 Multiple other non-CIT people have e-mailed Hoffman and asked him to either explain trying to marginalize their work or stop doing it, and he refuses to respond. See first and third posts here by Ligon and mreed: http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=508&st=30 These are not the actions of a fellow truth seeker. Edited by MIHOP, Mar 4 2009, 02:24 PM.
Posts: 5 Group: Members Member #917 Joined: 11/02/08

There Was No Missile At the Pentagon · Pentagon