Viewing Single Post From: If Not Plane Or Missle.......What?

Viewing Single Post From: If Not Plane Or Missle.......What?
bryan26	Mar 4 2009, 09:04 AM
troll Posts: 66 Group: BANNED! Member #1,067 Joined: 02/23/09	Aldo Marquis CIT Mar 3 2009, 04:27 PM There was a plane and it did not hit. It was more than likely explosives, which can accomplish the "cone shape" damage pattern you are referring to. Unless you would like to explain to us how the plane approached on the north side of the Citgo, struck the five light poles, showed up low and level across the law in the surveillance video, hit the fence/generator trailer with it's right wing/engine, and skimmed under the second floor and into the first floor causing the directional damage pattern oultined by the ASCE. Other than that, you may want to read/watch up on our work: ThePentaCon.com I have already watched Pentacon. You say the damage could be accomplished with explosives, but I don't see that as possible. It is very easy to tell if damage was caused by stationary explosives or an impact from an object moving in a certain direction. I don't believe the noc theory. IMO it woud be impossible for the plane to flyover the pentagon and fool any and all into thinking it hit. The plane would have to fly through, over, or before the explosion. The explosion is not going to hide the plane from all POVs. The plane would have to be at an altitude high enough to fly over the building. The explosion occurred very low in the building. The plane would be at one point and the explosion at another. The human brain will not be fooled. If the flyover is impossible, noc did not happen. When you say that, "the plane was noc, thus a, b, c, d, e are true, you are going from one fallacy to another.


If Not Plane Or Missle.......What? · Skeptics