| Viewing Single Post From: If Not Plane Or Missle.......What? | |
|---|---|
| bryan26 | Mar 3 2009, 03:02 PM |
|
troll
|
I read Craig's memo saying no plane or missle hit the pentagon. There is damage to the building. The pattern of damage suggests something hit at an angle consistant with the official flight path. The damage is in a cone-like shape from entry to exit. This is consistant with the laws of physics, as the object would loose force and mass as it traveled through the building. What is the truthers official theory on how the building sustained the damage? Before a theory can be put forth it frst has to be shown that it is possible. Is it possible for stationary exposives to produce the damage at the pentagon? If some object hit the building and it wasn't a missle or a plane? What else could it have been? |
 |
|
| If Not Plane Or Missle.......What? · Skeptics | |
9:17 AM Dec 5
