Viewing Single Post From: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon

Viewing Single Post From: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon
8bitagent	Feb 20 2009, 06:21 PM
Posts: 153 Group: Members Member #783 Joined: 08/02/08	Craig Ranke CIT Feb 20 2009, 12:26 PM 8bitagent Feb 20 2009, 08:21 AM But I see this footage of a jet slamming 500 mph into a wall, and I cant help but think...well when 500 mph jets slam into walls, there's not going to be much left: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--_RGM4Abv8 You're kidding right? How can you compare a 2 seat fighter slamming into about 10 feet of solid concrete simulating a nuclear reactor to a massive 90 ton Boeing hitting 2 feet of limestone, brick, and concrete? It's a completely flawed analogy to begin with but even if it wasn't it certainly would not begin to contradict the multiple lines of evidence you just mentioned proving a deception, cover-up, and FACT that the plane could not have hit the light poles or the Pentagon. First off, I have greatly enjoyed your guys work since the first early 2007 release. I've noticed on AboveTopSecret and elsewhere when people attack you guys, they never try to address the gravely different flight pattern anomaly. They don't address anything but hurl ad hominems and then the big thing: they go back to interviews or statements to say "See, so in so saw the plane hit". But I personally have not seen anyone explain how there can be two wildly different flight patterns. I am quite stunned at the level of cooperation of all those folks youve been able to get on camera/film. Independent films like "Severe Visibility" have tried to weave their own Pentagon, theory, but it's more than noteworthy that you guys have spent a considerable amount of time in DC/Arlington to have face to face time with people. However, as much as the government refuses to release pictures of passenger bodies or more of the plane part pictures...one has to wonder why so many reports are out there by first hand accounts of sifting through passenger remains, seats, etc. Now on the OC Register, one comment did stand out: Quote: No airport in the entire world reported Flight 77 landing. Hundreds of members of the Arlington County Fire Department saw bodies, luggage and airplane parts in the Pentagon. 184 of the bodies were postively identified. Not one single family member of the 59 people who died on that flight have come forward to support this nonsense. Over 150 first responders are named in a new book entitled, Firefight: The Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11 by Patrick Creed and Rick Newman. The CIT guys won't interview any of these witnesses. They won't contact anyone at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology who conducted the autopsies. Basically, anyone who disagrees with their theory is either: in on it, being tricked by the "evil doers" or being somehow silenced. I find it imperative that all sides of things are looked at for impartialality. It's stunning admittedly how everyone you've talked to has staked their reputation by placing the plane decidedly at odds with the official NTSB flightpath. But what about the people who sifted through non Pentagon worker bodies, luggage, etc? One has to wonder just how many "operatives" would have to be in on it. The entire forenzic team? Planting al Hazmi's burnt drivers licence? I think that's why many folks are agnostic on the whole thing, as while controlled demolition at the WTC is a very rorschach test kind of thing to most...over a dozen witnesses sticking to a north side flyover is quite something. Anyways, I like ya guys. I'm just trying to envision a scenario where the Flight 77 passengers remains, luggage, etc is secretly stores inside or whatever theory some might have.
Posts: 153 Group: Members Member #783 Joined: 08/02/08

Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon · Pentagon