Viewing Single Post From: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon

Viewing Single Post From: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon
Domenick DiMaggio	Feb 20 2009, 07:03 AM
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08	8bitagent Feb 20 2009, 05:56 AM So question: If thousands of people sifted through the Pentagon hole and law, and inside offices and intimately described seatbelts, non Pentagon employee charred remains, burn luggage, etc. and people literally did see the plane slam into the Pentagon then 1. How is it possible a missile or passenger-less plane hit it? 2. How is it possible that no plane or object slammed into it?(CIT theory) 3. How come during the Moussaoui trial and sense, the government has never released more pictures of the plane wreckage or albeit grizzly photos of the passengers? Weve seen al Hazmi's burnt drivers licence. And plane parts inside and out. I personally believe Flight 77 slammed into the 77 foot Pentagon. But I think its clear the flight path is a bit off and theres definitely some odd anomalies at play. Its 2009. Anyone have any new thoughts on this matter? 1. its not possible because it didn't happen. 2. well i dont know who saw seatbelts.....anyways some people post a picture of a pentagon employee who died at their desk and claim it is a passenger in their seat. if that were the case then we should expect to find more passengers still in their seats but there were none because there was none. people died inside the pentagon. that doesn't prove any of them where on a plane when they met their end. april gallop was there, unlike the author of this 'book'. she said a plane didnt hit. she said there was no smell of jet fuel or huge jet fuel fires but explosions that went off. she also crawled out the [not] 90 foot hole [excuse while i vomit on that] prior to the collapse. 3. because there weren't any. 8bit, i respect your work. a lot and you know that. the flight path cannot be off at all for your conclusion to be accurate. there is no room for error in this regard. the plane never hit any poles. no one witnessed it. the plane flew over the navy annex. the official flight path is now destroyed. the plane flew on the north side of the citgo station. the sustained damage is now impossible for the cause to be this plane. they blew it up and lied to you. lying = it's what they do.
Posts: 2,006 Group: Members Member #22 Joined: 01/14/08

Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon · Pentagon