justfacts

Feb 13 2009, 09:53 AM

JFK

Feb 13 2009, 09:30 AM

justfacts

Feb 13 2009, 08:38 AM

tuatara

Feb 12 2009, 06:32 PM

justfacts

Feb 12 2009, 03:16 PM

Exactly what are you looking for? You want someone to say "Eureka"!! you are correct sir, the plane could not have hit those poles and flown north of the gas station!! Brilliant!! Person or persons unknown must have snuck in before or after the fact and planted pole pieces and taken the original poles down! Wow! Let's go get them.

Or, you can say that some persons think the plane may have flown slightly closer to them then it actually did, perfectly reasonable considering the expedited duration of the event, and the poles were displaced when they were struck by parts of the rapidly moving airplane.

You can have it either way.

I set out what I was looking for in my first thread, since when you began your campaign of obfuscation.

If you believe that all of the CIT eye-witnesses are incorrect in their placing of the plane as it flew towards the Pentagon (where for some of them it was as simple a choice as left or right and they all chose a path north of the Citgo gas station) then I want to know why you believe it, what compelling evidence is there that you have that all of these eye-witnesses are incorrect in such a similar way.

Like I said above, they all thought the plane flew closer to them then it actually did. Not a big deal, not difficult to imagine, not difficult to understand considering the circumstances. Also, I've seen and read some of the so-called CIT "interviews". As investigative inquires I would be kind in saying that they leave a lot to be desired. Please note that when asked to draw the flight path on a google earth map they all drew different paths. Some of them varied by hundreds of feet. And I believe they all said that the plane crashed into the Pentagon. Add that to the broken light poles, plane debris in and around the Pentagon, DNA results of the remains matching the passenger list, radar and flight data records, other testimony regarding seeing the plane crash into the Pentagon and the sum answer is that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon.

Indeed they did draw different paths, but the one thing those paths all had in common is that they were all north of the CITGO.

That is irreconcilable with the downed light poles, and you should know that if you wished to live up to your username.

I didn't say that it wasn't irreconciable, I just say it doesn't matter.
The other thing they all had in common is they all terminated at the Pentagon.
So why not call them "End at Pentagon" rather than "North of Citgo"?