tuatara

Feb 12 2009, 06:32 PM

justfacts

Feb 12 2009, 03:16 PM

Exactly what are you looking for? You want someone to say "Eureka"!! you are correct sir, the plane could not have hit those poles and flown north of the gas station!! Brilliant!! Person or persons unknown must have snuck in before or after the fact and planted pole pieces and taken the original poles down! Wow! Let's go get them.

Or, you can say that some persons think the plane may have flown slightly closer to them then it actually did, perfectly reasonable considering the expedited duration of the event, and the poles were displaced when they were struck by parts of the rapidly moving airplane.

You can have it either way.

I set out what I was looking for in my first thread, since when you began your campaign of obfuscation.

If you believe that all of the CIT eye-witnesses are incorrect in their placing of the plane as it flew towards the Pentagon (where for some of them it was as simple a choice as left or right and they all chose a path north of the Citgo gas station) then I want to know why you believe it, what compelling evidence is there that you have that all of these eye-witnesses are incorrect in such a similar way.