tuatara

Feb 12 2009, 02:08 PM

justfacts

Feb 12 2009, 08:37 AM

tuatara

Feb 11 2009, 06:32 PM

justfacts

Feb 11 2009, 03:35 PM

1) Since "they" have not shown a single flightpath, it is impossible to say what the non-existant path is or is not compatible with.

Please pick any flightpath that passes north of the Citgo gas station. I am struggling to see why you would require over 10 eye-witnesses in differing locations to come up with a single flightpath.

You kind of answered yourself. Different people in different locations have different perspectives with regard to a very rapidly moving object. Then you take and conglomerate these various perspectives and apply a generalized, but misleading, label like "North of Citgo". I could just as easily say that the flightpath was "West of the Atlantic Ocean" or "South of Philadelphia" or "East of the Mississippi". The physical and technical evidence sorts out the witness accounts, not the reverse.

So to summarise your input to date - you have absolutely nothing to offer. North of the Citgo is not misleading at all - it is perfectly clear and relatively precise.