| Viewing Single Post From: Are there any flyover witnesses? | |
|---|---|
| Craig Ranke CIT | Jan 16 2008, 02:43 PM |
|
But none of them would be able to see the flight path or the alleged impact at all. This means they would be unaware of the event until after the explosion. It would be about 2 or 3 seconds before the flyover was ascending upriver exactly like a normal Reagan departure. Nobody on the bridge would have a clue what had happened and the fireball and smoke plume would be an incredible diversion from the very normal sight of a jet ascending up the river which happens ever 2 to 4 minutes all day long every day. Even if they did see the jet flying away and even if they did report it we will never know because the 911 calls have been permanently confiscated. This fact alone implicates a cover-up of what people really first reported before the propaganda machine was implemented within minutes. And if any of these witnesses on the bridge who happened to catch the plane flying away still had questions about what they saw after the event and looked into it they would find reports of an ambiguous "2nd plane" that flew away immediately after the explosion. Even if that didn't satisfy them....what do you think would happen if they called the FBI or even a reporter about it in the hysterically patriotic weeks or months after the event when virtually the entire country wanted to nuke Afghanistan and Bush had a 90%+ approval rating? Clearly nothing. |
 |
|
| Are there any flyover witnesses? · Pentagon | |
8:25 PM Nov 25
