Viewing Single Post From: Are there any flyover witnesses?

Viewing Single Post From: Are there any flyover witnesses?
Craig Ranke CIT	Jan 16 2008, 01:33 PM
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	dbalsdon Jan 16 2008, 12:48 PM Craig. Maybe. that list you've linked to is right. But its also hard, to not notice that a lot of those names that you've listed, don't have any remarks after them, which i'm taking to assume, their accounts are verified, and they saw the plane hit. That still adds up to more witnesses then there is of a 2nd plane. No it does not mean their accounts are verified. It simply means that it might be hypothetically possible for them to see an impact from their reported location and that they simply claim they did. Point is the list is whittled down to just over a couple dozen and when you factor in the natural tendency of honest witnesses or dishonest reporters to deduce and embellish, not to mention the fact that we know for a fact that some planted liars are involved with this operation, as well the proven fact that the plane was on the north side of the citgo, and it's clear that this deception was manageable. The media reported what the official story told them to report on that day due to the mass confusion particularly at the Pentagon. Naturally it would be easy to find honest people who deduced the impact and they would have been fed some planted liars. Furthermore they would have dismissed witnesses who didn't support the official story as anomalous or simply wrong. This doesn't prove that there weren't any. The media did not question the government (as they should have) on 9/11 or any time afterwards. That is why we sought to confirm what really happened and find out where the plane really flew. The flight path proves a deception. The fact that there are just over a couple dozen of unconfirmed media reported accounts confirming the impact does not disprove the deception. Quote: Also, how can you give more credit to an eyewitness who, as i claimed earlier, appeared to be quite far away from the pentagon, and had an obscured view of it? I'm not sure what witnesses you are talking about here. We know there was no second plane that "shadowed" or "veered away' as AA77 hit the building. We certainly believe that some of the 2nd plane witnesses are lying. The 2nd plane cover story was absolutely planned and they used a real C-130 and a real E4B combined with some planted accounts of a second plane to sow confusion and have an ambiguous explanation out there floating around for the flyover.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08

Are there any flyover witnesses? · Pentagon