Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Monte Belger's interview with the Commission
Woody Box

Aldo Marquis CIT
Feb 3 2009, 03:46 PM


Not "CNN". The "CNN reporter". He was reporting HIS eyewitness testimony or knowledge at that moment. I see what you are getting at Woody and I knew you would take it there, rather than embracing this possibility. I still do not see enough evidence for this Phanton 93. Sorry. We will just have to agree to disagree and I know I will personally still continue to use Mineta's account to support the DC flight path.


So in God's name, do what you have to do, Aldo, on your own responsibility. But when you are in DC again, don't forget to check out when the OEOB was evacuated...

With regards to Phantom Flight 93, more and more evidence is leaking out; just wait a little bit. Meanwhile I have found definitive proof that this plane was not a "projected flight path", but a real plane sending primary radar echo to ATC. It is fashion amongst JREFers to explain this plane away as an artificial radar blip on the "Tactical Situation Display". The source I've found now belies this TSD theory.

Quote:
 
What is interesting to note is how Boone and other "duh-bunkers" won't touch this one one bit. If they agree with you, 9/11 involves a deception and if they agree with me, 9/11 involves a deception. lol. They would never agree with a 9/11 truthseeker whether they were right or not.


Well I think they're waiting that we mangle each other... but darn, popcorn is finished, and nothing has happened yet...


Offline Profile Quote Post
Monte Belger's interview with the Commission · Pentagon