Viewing Single Post From: Monte Belger's interview with the Commission

Viewing Single Post From: Monte Belger's interview with the Commission
Woody Box	Feb 3 2009, 02:30 PM
Posts: 118 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08	The first WH employees left the building shortly after the second WTC strike, but this evacuation happened calmly. This is part of the official story, and this is how it was reported by CNN. I never have contested that. I have, however, not seen one report that OEOB employees started with their evacuation at that time, too. Quote: Logic would dictate that the CNN reporter simply did not see people coming out of the (Old)Executive Office Building and Mineta did in the first wave of evacuations or people high tailing it out of there be it because of the attacks in NY or because of the reports of fire or the fear of a terrorist attack down the street at the WH. CNN "did not see" people pouring out of the OEOB at 9:20? CNN "did not see" people running out of the WH at 9:20? What kind of logic is dictating that to you? CNN reported that the evacuation started "slowly" around 9:20. Only at 9:40/9:45 people started to run, according to CNN. Mineta describes exactly what was reported by CNN for 9:40/9:45; people running out of the WH and the OEOB, running over to Lafayette Park. I've yet to see one report or one eyewitness that people ("everybody", according to Mineta) were running out of these buildings at 9:20. Your "logic" is pure speculation for me, sorry to say that. Quote: There is no reason to suggest Mineta made up this whole elaborate story involving Belger that not only goes against the official story flight path but matches or fits in with the actual DC flight path seen and reported by many (as documented by us). As I said already, Mineta's elaborated story with Belger has probably happened; no need to make it up. He only needed to change two little details - the time and the identity of the plane - to make it compatible with his earlier statements. As I said already, I consider the question where the plane came from before it was spotted by Chaconas as secondary; the NTSB path already has been belied by you guys. If you have so many eyewitnesses for the "DC flight path", great, but then you don't need Mineta's dubious accounts. The reason I insist on Mineta being a liar and jumped in here is that the plane he's talking about - "phantom flight 93" - is the key for uncovering 9/11 as an Operation Northwoods maneuver. I tell you: if a new investigation is launched at one point in the future, it will quickly become clear that he was not telling the truth (probably he will blame it to his bad memory then) and embarass everyone who used his funny testimony to make up his own theory.
Posts: 118 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08

Monte Belger's interview with the Commission · Pentagon