| Viewing Single Post From: Are there any flyover witnesses? | |
|---|---|
| Craig Ranke CIT | Jan 16 2008, 02:13 AM |
|
I would first like to make it clear that while CIT fully believes the plane flew over the Pentagon the direct evidence we have simply proves the plane was on the north side of the citgo station meaning it did not cause the physical damage starting with the light poles. Any hypothesis must incorporate the north side evidence so we believe the flyover is he most logical choice However Robert Turcios specifically claims the plane "pulled up" which is very compelling and direct evidence of a flyover. He is in fact the flyover witness because of this as he even admits that he could not see the "impact" due to the fireball.  We consider the flyover hypothesis not merely a theory but the only reasonable alternative in light of the evidence. If the plane did not cause the physical damage it had to have flown over the building unless some sort of exotic weaponry was used to "disappear" the plane which we do not believe. But the notion that there are no witnesses to the flyover is patently false if you consider 2 important factors: 1. The 2nd plane cover story. Clearly there WERE reports of a plane that flew over the Pentagon immediately after the explosion. They simply refer to it as a "2nd plane". So if there really was a "2nd plane" that flew over the building why wasn't it more widely reported? Why didn't ALL the witnesses see this? Does the fact that this wasn't widely reported prove that these reports are fabricated? You have to realize that the media reported that the government told them about a jet allegedly impacting the building within about 4 minutes after the attack. In all the hysteria of that day the only reports that were considered truly valid are the ones that came from the government. If someone reported something that contradicted the official story it was considered "anomalous" and not widely reported by the media. So these accounts of a "2nd plane" or ANY plane that flew over the Pentagon would have been shrugged off and not reported because the government said that AA77 hit the building. So this leads us to the second factor that disproves the notion that nobody reported a flyover. 2. The confiscated and permanently sequestered 911 calls. The only way to know what people REALLY reported without the filter of the complicit and/or manipulated mainstream media is to get a hold of the 911 call tapes and transcripts. But that will never happen because suspiciously......they have been confiscated by the FBI and never released to this day UNLIKE in New York. This is clearly because they have something to hide in Arlington. It's very important that the movement focuses attention on this because this evidence is just as important as the video tape of the event that will never be released. Because these tapes have been hidden we will NEVER know what people really first reported so you can not accurately say that "nobody reported the flyover". The fact that the mainstream media only reported witnesses who supported the official story is not surprising. People who contradicted it were simply written off as anomalous and incorrect. Plus there are a few more reasons why people who may have seen the flyover plane wouldn't have been alarmed by it or even bothered to report it. Realize that this was about a 3 second event so most people in the area wouldn't be alerted to it until AFTER the explosion at which point the plane would be well past the Pentagon and anyone who saw it could easily think it was air traffic from Reagan National Airport which is RIGHT NEXT to the Pentagon.  Planes fly over the Pentagon all day long every day every 2 to 4 minutes. You can even see and hear it happening during our interviews. So even if someone was suspicious or curious about the plane they saw flying away after the explosion they would write it off as inconsequential after hearing the media start reporting that AA77 hit the building 4 minutes after the event. They would simply think they saw another plane and be completely satisfied of this after reading reports of people like Kelly Knowles:
That would sure satisfy a lot of people who saw a jet fly away.  And we must also remember that there is virtually NOTHING on the other side of the Pentagon until you cross over the Potomac river into DC.  Scott Cook had one of the closest views possible and this is a shot from his office window:  You can barely see the Pentagon at all! Obviously not many people on the other side would have a very detailed view of a plane flying over the Pentagon after the explosion and even if they did they would simply be pointed once again to the 2nd plane cover story. Edited by Craig Ranke CIT, Jan 21 2008, 01:42 AM.
|
 |
|
| Are there any flyover witnesses? · Pentagon | |
8:26 PM Nov 30
