Viewing Single Post From: Monte Belger's interview with the Commission

Viewing Single Post From: Monte Belger's interview with the Commission
Woody Box	Jan 27 2009, 04:01 PM
Posts: 118 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08	Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 26 2009, 12:46 PM Woody Box Jan 24 2009, 05:59 PM So you think Belger is lying in his statement, Aldo? No. Because it is not his statement. It is a narrative or overview of an ALLEGED interview with Belger. It could be a summation that simply omits his contact with Mineta. Mineta is way too specific in a very fatal detail. If he is lying now, it would be out of pressure from the you know who's. Belger is as silent as a church house mouse that witnessed a mob hit. I know this, because I called him. He does not want to talk about the statements Mineta made. They all know something is wrong and rather than do the right thing, they would rather be chickens and be complicit in a cover up. With what these sick fuks do to people, I don't blame them for their fear and silent cooperation. So to sum it up, I haven't heard Belger lie anywhere in fact, I have not heard Belger's own words. Independent confirmation is everything. So you question the authenticity of this memo and think it's completely worthless. I respectfully disagree. I really believe that Belger was interviewed by Bill Johnston and John Raidt on November 24, 2003 at 9 o'clock at the GSA Commission Office (whatever GSA means). I also believe that this quote here Quote: Between 9:20-9:45 there were many confusing reports about various aircraft being unaccounted for. He heard of a crash on the Indiana/Kentucky border that was thought to be AAL 77. By this point he believes he talked with Bob Baker and Russ Chew at AAL. Jane Garvey talked to Don Carty. implies that the possible crash of AAL 77 on the Indiana/Kentucky border was the most "exciting" thing Belger recalls for this time interval. Again, IF he tracked the Pentaplane and was in contact with Mineta at the same time, this omission qualifies for a lie IMO. The big problem is, there's no motive for him to lie. Assumed he tracked the Pentaplane - why should he not simply say that he tracked it instead of omitting it? This wouldn't have hurt the official story. The same goes for the Commissioners. I' m ready to believe and have found examples that these guys tend to ommit details. But assumed Belger told them that he tracked the Pentaplane - what motive did they have to ommit that part? Independent confirmation is everything - 100% agreed. The problem is that you need to find someone who independently confirms Mineta's claim that Flight 77/the Pentaplane/whatever was tracked by FAA at 9:20-9:30 (before it was spotted by Dulles controllers). Mineta is the one whose account needs confirmation, not Belger. And not only Belger does not confirm Mineta, here's another one in an outstanding position to verify or falsify Mineta (NORAD tapes, Channel 4, at about 9:30) Quote: However, the manager of Washington ARTCC states very clearly that Washington and the surrounding ARTCC's desperately tried to pick up primary targets who possibly could have been the missing Flight 77. The manager not only "makes no mention of the primary radar track headed straight for Washington DC" (Farmer) - he explicitly says that there was no such primary radar track! Here's what the manager of Washington ARTCC said: "so what we have done at the surrounding centers here is tell everyone to look out for limited codes, primary targets, or whatever the case may be. And that was the last time, that was about fifteen minutes ago since I talked to the Indianapolis Center Operations Manager." http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2008/12/john-farmers-failed-analysis-of-norad.html Apparently, this man falsifies Mineta. Up to now, Mineta is the only one who was tracking Flight 77/Pentaplane/whatever before 9:30. Given that the summary of his accounts bursts with contradictions, I rather believe Belger and the Washington Center manager.
Posts: 118 Group: Members Member #109 Joined: 01/17/08

Monte Belger's interview with the Commission · Pentagon