| Viewing Single Post From: Hey there | |
|---|---|
| Arcterus | Jan 26 2009, 12:39 AM |
|
I've joined incarnations of this board a few times throughout the past but for some reason never have the time to stay on. I thought I'd re-join anyway. I've been involved with the 9/11 Truth Movement since late 2005, and in that time have had great deal of contemplation on forming my personal conclusions on 9/11. Having said that, I'm always ready to change my opinions should I run into compelling evidence. So...to say a bit about myself, my first name is Kamen. I'm 17 years old - 18 in less than a month - and am a senior at Bellevue High School. I'm a maker of independent films, including one I'm working on right now, called Imbalance, which is nearing the end of it's production phase. Since this is a 9/11 Truth forum, it's only valid to generically state my personal theories on each main section of 9/11. Overall, I'm thus far convinced that 9/11 was an inside job. I believe the World Trade Center, as well as Building 7, were brought down by controlled demolition. Contrary to what most on this board probably endorse, I do believe a plane crashed into the Pentagon, but do not concede that the plane was piloted by some martyr Muslim. I feel it's far more likely, and this is simpler than it may sound, that it was piloted by some type of trojan horse program. As for Flight 93, I believe it was shot down. My introduction to the 9/11 Truth movement was not from Loose Change, but it was the first documentary I saw on the subject. Although my personal conclusions thus far have deviated from some of the conclusions Loose Change presents, I've always respected it as an excellent way of spreading interest of the subject among the masses. I also hold Loose Change: Final Cut in high regard as it does an excellent job of keeping a relatively unbiased view of 9/11. I also write a series of articles called 9/11 Hoaxes. Although I've yet to complete so much as the second article, as I've been particularly busy the last couple of years, I do intend to continue the series. The articles focus on analyzing theories that have been presented throughout the movement. Particularly, I take theories which I deem to be hoaxes and give arguments on every significant angle to debunk it. This is for the purpose of not letting hoax theories become too prominent throughout the movement. My first article, written two years ago, detailed the fallacies behind the theory that no plane hit The Pentagon, and was well-received by the few who took the time to read it, including people who had formerly believed in the no-plane theory. The current one I'm working on details the theory that no plane hit the World Trade Center. That's a theory I think we'll be more on the same track with. Anyway, I look forward to participating in discussion among the board, with those who share my conclusions or oppose them, and that includes defenders of the official story. |
 |
|
| Hey there · Welcome Newcomers! | |
9:29 PM Nov 25
