| Viewing Single Post From: New Columbine Interview | |
|---|---|
| evanlong | Jan 14 2009, 02:35 AM |
|
Thank you. However, I find it very difficult to write off the Perry statements, for example. I don't know what else you are suggesting could possibly be made of these. If it's true that even just Perry was involved in addition to Harris and Klebold, that alone opens a huge can of worms.
Fifteen citations was not a very good estimate, even for a rough one, concerning the number of reports I'm talking about, which is fairly critical to get a handle on. I hope you can understand how it might have appeared that you might have been trying to deliberately misrepresent my presentation. In any case, most of the information about what the witnesses told "investigators" was edited at least for details and length if not for content. A look through the documents shows that most of the reports are officers' summaries of interviews and not word-for-word transcripts of them, although many direct quotes and handwritten statements, maps, etc. are interspersed throughout. What we're looking at, though, even through this filter, is police being bombarded with statements concerning additional gunmen, shots being fired in disparate areas of the school simultaneously, and so on. Is it possible that these statements were honestly collected as part of an routine investigative effort on the lowest level, turned in for processing, an agenda set by higher-ups and things manipulated to direct efforts toward producing predetermined results? I'll say it again: from what they are telling us by releasing these files, law enforcement was told repeatedly by many corroborating witnesses about additional attackers, many naming them by name. Public officials even made several public statements in the first few months indicating that many on the case believed there to possibly be accomplices. A sampling: "I think we have to pursue vigorously, at least for the time being, the idea that there may have been other people involved at least in the planning and knowledge that this might occur. There were other people who are knowledgeable or seemed to be associated with this group of people. What we are a little bit unclear about is how all these devices got here and whether other people assisted them." - U.S. Attorney Tom Strickland "There are backpacks with bombs in there everywhere. The officers in there are convinced there had to be more people involved. There's just too much stuff [...]." - Governor Bill Owens "I've never thought it was just two because of the amount of stuff that was brought in, but we don't have enough to charge anyone". - Sheriff John Stone Indeed, former TCMer Pat McDuffy reportedly told police that about a dozen individuals were involved in some way, including in the manufacture of the bombs. Here is a link to the video segment which features his alleged statements: "The Columbine Cause (9 of 16 - The Trench Coat Mafia)" The two-dead-shooters scenario would mean no loose ends, no one potentially talking about any school faculty who might have known anything, no peers who might have known anything, no parents who might have known anything, no shrinks who might have known anything, and certainly no government or military personnel who might have known anything. Looking at what they're telling us they had as far as intelligence and then looking at the conclusions they're telling us they drew from it, how can one not conclude that somebody, somewhere along the line, said, "Here are the conclusions; never mind the investigation". If your witness friend would like to contact me, she may use the e-mail address on the web site. |
 |
|
| New Columbine Interview · New World Order | |
12:20 PM Nov 28
