| Viewing Single Post From: general shanksville discussion..... | |
|---|---|
| Domenick DiMaggio | Dec 18 2008, 04:03 AM |
|
since residents for the most part witnessed the 2 white planes after the event and all recognize those planes as being 'military' in appearance and the incredible lack of debris at the site leads a lot of the locals here to believe the government shot it down and that event is what is responsible for the large amount of plane debris not being visible. as per my interview with wally miller, i'm not interested in getting into debates about what happened or not. i know wally miller knows worked that scene. i've been told by someone that miller himself told him the plane had been shot down thats why they recovered so little of it. i know bringing up the words shot down to miller was going to get an interesting reaction. he did not disappoint in this regard. it is possible that the plane really was shot down. perhaps beamer was a plane different than the one ed felt was one? the plane could be shot down and the crash site could be the camp david site and the shanksville site is a diversion perhaps because the plane wasn't really flight 93. there's still lots of possibilities in my mind because i still have a lot of unanswered questions. what i still haven't completely answered for myself what took place in that field although i know what was there and when. i dont have an eyewitness to its actions and due to the topography of the area the only possible witnesses would have to have had a reason to be in that spot. you have to be there to understand this. |
 |
|
| general shanksville discussion..... · Shanksville | |
4:29 AM Nov 30
