|
Viewing Single Post From: Financial Times Admits Agenda for World Government
|
|
hiphopopotamus
|
Dec 11 2008, 07:30 PM
|
|
- Posts:
- 211
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #578
- Joined:
- 05/16/08
|
- Lord Tsukasa
- Dec 10 2008, 05:20 PM
- hiphopopotamus
- Dec 10 2008, 01:25 AM
- Lord Tsukasa
- Dec 9 2008, 05:28 PM
It's saying: "We have a bunch of global problems, so a global government could work!".
You've got it almost right. Anyways, what about that implies - Quote:
-
that not only is world government the agenda, but that world government will only be achieved through dictatorial measures because the majority of the people are dead against it.
? Nothing. Meaning, the article was taken out of context.
After this FT guy goes on about how global government would be a reasonable response to global problems, he says: "International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic. "
Once again, taking out of context. He means that a place so large as the world has many problems, and a democratic world government would be unable to quickly rectify those problems. Which is why he goes on to say a world government wont work.
You're reading far too much into it.
|
|
|
4:07 PM Nov 26
