| Viewing Single Post From: There are still no eyewitness reports of a flyover | |
|---|---|
| 22205 | Dec 3 2008, 10:16 PM |
Arlingtonian
|
bump for albion. the reason this is so important jthomas, has little to do with your being banned. the real agenda here is that i want you to answer for what happened with the trip you were supposed to take to Arlington to find and document South of Citgo witnesses. either you came and found witnesses, but for obvious (NoC) reasons, you are not divulging what you found out, or- you were full of shit, and never intended to come here. thus your claim of having booked a flight for Arlington was supposed to be some sort of way to call CIT's bluff, hoping they would be scared that you would find some witnesses to contradict the 13+ people who saw a North of Citgo plane. but it looks like your bluff blew up in your face! you still have no one to stand by or allege a south of citgo approach. NOT ONE! all you have are highly suspect static accounts on paper and in cyber space parroting the official story. yet you continue your pseudo-skeptical grift without shame or conscience. you run circles around the truth, moving goalposts and building strawmen, instead of doing the one thing that can substantiate YOUR claims: find, document, and validate even one south of citgo flight path witness. nevermind that you cant find 13 of them. all you need is ONE! cuz even with just one such witness, at least you have earned some sort of credibility and respect. without any effort on your part to find such a witness, you are nothing but a liar and hypocrite, who recklessly spews falsehoods in a conscious effort to marginalize and undermine THE TRUTH. |
 |
|
| There are still no eyewitness reports of a flyover · Skeptics | |
5:00 AM Dec 3
