- Quote:
-
Well, we know an airliner hit the Pentagon. American Airlines is missing one of their planes, people are missing family members, parts of the airliner that crashed were found at the Pentagon as well as body parts shown to be those on the flight.
Shown to be those on the flight? Can you prove that?
- Quote:
-
No one has shown us any body parts or debris from the crash that did not belong there.
Except for the fuselage piece with rivet holes, but no rivets.
- Quote:
-
Add this all up and there is no reason to doubt that Lloyde's cab was hit by a pole knocked down by flight 77.
Wrong trajectory. There's no way that light pole could've traveled in that direction.
- Quote:
-
The possible mistaken observations of a few people who thought the aircraft's route was slightly different than it actually was is no good reason to doubt that flight 77 crashed at the Pentagon.
LOL!  "Slightly different"! OMG!
- Quote:
-
A curved metal pole hit his is windshield and damaged the interior of his cab. If you take a look at how it is shaped, it does not have to touch the hood. With one end in the car and one end on the ground, the curved portion might not have touched the hood, but the front quarter panels instead.
Again with the JREF argument. Look, stop trying to change this guy's ridiculous story. That is NOT what he said.
- Quote:
-
I feel that the sole reason the videos make out Lloyde to be a liar is that the producers started with a conclusion and picked the evidence to support their it. Dismissing all other evidence that supports any other conclusion is another tactic used.
He looks like a liar because he insisted he was hundreds of feet north of his actual location, even after he was shown photographic evidence indicating otherwise.
| 
9:05 PM Nov 30
