Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Lloyde England and His Cab - The Eye of the Storm
Aldo Marquis CIT
Member Avatar

Bernie big shorts
Oct 30 2008, 02:54 PM


Quote:
 
The aircraft hasn't been proven to have flown north of citgo, it has been speculated based on eyewitness accounts.


Yes it has. It has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Corroboration is a scientific process. It is not speculation. If you want to know which side of the gas station the plane flew on what do you do, Bernie? Who do you ask, Bernie?


Quote:
 
This is unreliable.


No it isn't. It is more than relaible, because it is a simple questions about a simple detail that no one has forgotten and no one, including the eyewitnesses we've contacted, has been able to refute.


Quote:
 
The damage at the pentagon and the data from the fdr is consistent with a south of citgo path.


Dude. Seriously. Pilotsfor911truth.org. Seriously. Do you even know what you are talking about?

Quote:
 
The FAA flight path you mention isn't the official data as i understand.


It sure as shit is in line with what the witnesses describe and certainly OFFICIALLY comes from the FAA.

Quote:
 
You say Lloyd is lying about the pole flying through his car, this is an unfounded allegation, it is very unfair on a very nice old man that took a lot of time out to help the CIT guys.


Round and round we go. The plane approached on the north side of the Citgo. This has been established to the point of redundancy. You have nothing but photographs of light poles on the ground and you want to claim the heavily coroborated eyewitnesses are "unreliable". What a crock of shit.

Quote:
 
If you consider the obvious tendencies to locate things nearer to you in a traumatic situation that i discussed in a post above you can see that there is a rational explanation for both the north of citgo witnesses and Lloyds mistaken memory.


What about when right before you become "mistaken" you slip up about the position of a photographer being on the "bridge" where he takes a photo of your cab that was on the bridge, then after you start your assertive "mistaken-ness", you are then shown picture after picture after picture of you on the bridge? Would you concede you were wrong and a victim of "tendencies to locate things nearer to you in a traumatic situation" or would you continue on maitaining the absurdity of this false position location?
Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Oct 30 2008, 03:05 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Lloyde England and His Cab - The Eye of the Storm · Pentagon