|
Viewing Single Post From: Quietly Destroyed Steel
|
|
Miragememories
|
Oct 21 2008, 09:19 AM
|
|
- Posts:
- 759
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #40
- Joined:
- 01/15/08
|
- Scott75
-
"This morning, I delivered a post that may have delivered something of a knockout to the official story believers. I found a pdf on journal of 9/11 studies wherein a NIST director clearly debunks NIST's reasoning for not testing for thermite in the WTC buildings. This guy is -still- the program director for NIST's Advanced Measurement Laboratories. As far as I'm concerned, this is big news. The establishment is criticizing the establishment. Curiously, it seems that this information isn't known by that many. It's a rather technical explanation only examining the issue of whether or not NIST should test for thermite residues and I have certainly not seen this man (Robert F. Moore) going on a lecture circuit as Steven Jones has (who may at present be the most prominent scientist in the 9/11 truth movement). I also haven't found any other article by him. Perhaps he even regrets writing the one article I found. Whatever the case, I certainly believe that his article, and this person, deserve a lot more attention. This guy is -still- on the inside. That in itself is, in my view, surprising, considering the fates of people like Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan.
No one has responded to it as of yet:"http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2057222&postcount=1564
Nice post Scott.
I'm curious though as to how you determined that the Robert Moore, esq. who wrote that report was the same Robert F. Moore employed by the NIST?
MM
|
|
|