| Viewing Single Post From: Quietly Destroyed Steel | |
|---|---|
| Miragememories | Oct 16 2008, 10:05 AM |
|
The NIST WTC7 Report gave this reason for not considering other scenarios besides explosives. In a word; incredulity [being in a state of unwillingness to believe]. "[alternative methods]..were generally considered infeasible to carry out without detection." So, based on criteria founded on incredulity, the NIST created this very important determination. Stealth is part of a state-of-the-art profession (ask the C.I.A., the military, the private military etc. etc.). The NIST, have revealed no attempted research about the feasibility of a professional, stealth-based operation. In other words, they guessed it "wasn't feasible", specifically, because it was outside their area of expertise and they couldn't imagine how it could have been done covertly. So the NIST concluded it would be too difficult to sabotage WTC 7 through stealth. It also just happened to be a convenient way for the NIST to avoid going into a politically volatile "uncharted waters". The NIST WTC7 Report said this about explosive sound; ".. the sound level from all building perimeter openings at 1 km would be approximately 130 to 140 dB.." NIST: "The starting point of the final set of building vibrations at 6 seconds before the east penthouse began to fall indicated that an event had occurred within the building at that time." Unfortunately, the NIST do not say anything of value about the sound that was actually recorded for the 20+ seconds they examined. Given the NIST belief that serious failures were occurring for 13 seconds prior to visible global collapse, there is good reason to expect that high levels of noise would have been generated, and would have been recorded. But, what about all the explosions that were witnessed and not recorded in WTC 1? What about the relatively low audio levels, for the live recordings of the open air impacts on WTC1 & WTC2. The 'live' recordings are inconsistent and simply not that reliable as audio references. When recording high audio levels, the camcorders are prone to suffer from over modulation distortion, which makes it near impossible to distinguish individual sounds. The 'live' recordings are also missing many loud sounds which we know must have occurred. Eye witness testimony frequently fills in these gaps, but the NIST gives no explanation why they chose to ignore the voluminous reports of explosions, heard and experienced by people who were there. Given the media saturation available in NYC, it's amazing that there is so little recorded audio that is of any value in supporting or not supporting loud explosive-like sounds from the building interiors. There is much evidence of after impact explosions in WTC 1 but only a few recordings exist as verification. There is eyewitness testimony about explosions inside WTC 7, but none were recorded. Barry Jennings and Michael Hess, in particular, witnessed a major destructive explosion inside WTC 7, but it wasn't recorded by the Media, and potential witnesses on the street have not come forward in support of that claim. Did Jennings and Hess lie, or did WTC 7 contain the sound better than the NIST judged possible, and firefighters on the street didn't hear it or mistook it for something else? We also have the NIST claiming that from 6 seconds prior to WTC 7 east penthouse collapse until 7 seconds after, WTC 7 was virtually ripping itself apart inside as a prelude to it's global collapse initiation. Do we have audio recordings of what must have been very loud interior sounds created by heavy structural steel column buckling, floors collapsing and falling smashing debris? I've heard only audio from the global collapse, 7 seconds after the East Penthouse collapse, and even then, the recorded audio doesn't convey the loudness that must have existed. The NIST argues explosives would have been clearly heard and recorded, and since they weren't, they could not have existed, and therefore they attempt to close the chapter on a controlled demolition. Well I ask that if the NIST does not have audio recordings that support their collapse theory, loud sounds that we know must have existed for the NIST theory to be true, how can they dismiss the existence of loud explosive sounds that eye witnesses claim they heard, but the NIST doesn't have any audio recordings to substantiate? MM Edited by Miragememories, Oct 16 2008, 02:59 PM.
|
 |
|
| Quietly Destroyed Steel · WTC 7 | |
2:41 PM Dec 2
