Viewing Single Post From: pods

Viewing Single Post From: pods
mjd1982	Sep 27 2008, 12:02 PM
Posts: 3 Group: Members Member #867 Joined: 09/27/08	Hi there, I have just watched the film "In Plane site". I understand that this film doesnt have much credibility in the community, but I have a fe questions regarding the qualms tht have been raised about it. The main issue is the "pod" theory, i.e. that there was something attached to the bottom of the plane that hit the S Tower. Now, this has been debunked on the basis that this is in fact a "fairing", i.e. a standard piece of equipmennt attached to the base of planes to join the wings and the fuselage. But there is something that doesnt stick. Here is the pic from IPS: And here is an image of a fairing: There is a clear issue, namely that the fairing is located solely between the wings, not extending further up the fuselage, whereas the "pod" extends all the way up the fuselage from the fairing to the front of the base of the plane, and back from the fairing to the back of the base of the plane. So it would appear to me that what pod proponents are calling a pod, and what pod debunkers are calling a "fairing" are 2 different things. That being said, I may be missing something. Can someone help me if so? thanks M
Posts: 3 Group: Members Member #867 Joined: 09/27/08

pods · United Flight 175