| Viewing Single Post From: Do these WTC7 columns show thermite cuts? | |
|---|---|
| allbury | Sep 6 2008, 07:58 AM |
|
Another triumph for the cause of "truth." This isn't an honest discussion forum, it's a place that promotes a DVD full of lies, and only permits people to post on here if they agree with them. Is "JFK," who presumably blocked me from participating here, one of the shameless 9/11 profiteers behind Loose Change? I have presented numerous valid reasons why thermite or explosives couldn't possibly have been used to collapse any WTC building, and instead of addressing them like mature, rational adults, you simply prevent me from posting so you can continue to misrepresent facts about 9/11 without any accountability for your claims. The idea that explosives or thermite were planted in the WTC is completely absurd, and not supported by the slightest bit of credible evidence, but using censorship tactics like these is to be expected from people dishonest enough to promote this "theory." I'm wondering what triggered the decision to keep me out of the discussion, "JFK." Was it my suggestion that people voicing disagreement with the NIST findings should at least read http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1CollapseofTowers.pdf and http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf? Or was it my legitimate questions concerning Barry Jennings' story? This is the first format I've seen that only permits one side of a discussion, and I'd find it appalling if it weren't so genuinely comical. |
 |
|
| Do these WTC7 columns show thermite cuts? · WTC 7 | |
5:20 AM Nov 28
