|
Viewing Single Post From: Do these WTC7 columns show thermite cuts?
|
|
albury
|
Sep 3 2008, 08:20 AM
|
|
- Posts:
- 9
- Group:
- BANNED!
- Member
- #822
- Joined:
- 09/01/08
|
- Miragememories
- Sep 3 2008, 06:49 AM
- albury
-
"...and there would have been a ceramic-lined form around it to make the massive amounts of thermite or other incendiary necessary to sever a column that size burn sideways, since otherwise it would just have fallen off when ignited. I also think that if thermite or explosives had been used in the WTC, that fact would quickly have become very obvious to the ironworkers and other cleanup personnel at Ground Zero, none of whom reported seeing any such evidence."
During the massive high speed collapse, I would expect the brittle ceramic to be easily pulverized and rendered as inconspicuous dust. NIST had no problem accepting the "truly unbelievable" virtually complete removal of sprayed on fireproofing to the WTC Twin Towers floors, when impacted by aircraft. Whether ironworkers and cleanup personnel would take note of thermite-related details, that at the time, would appear to be irrelevant in a world accepting the Official Story, seems highly doubtful. They couldn't ignore the inexplicable (to the Official Story), molten metal and the long lasting fire though. MM
What would you have expected to have concealed, in a populated work area of a nearly fully-occupied office building, the ceramic-lined forms around numerous basement columns between the time the "thermite" was planted and when it was ignited? And why is it "truly unbelievable" that 250,000# planes going 440-540 mph would knock off SFRM that you could scrape off steel with your bare hands? It didn't have to be "virtually complete removal" to leave lightweight bar joists vulnerable to temperatures of 1100 F, and there is photographic documentation taken through windows by NYPD personnel in helicopters that some joists sagged at least 4' prior to collapse, and more irrefutable evidence of inward bowing of perimeter columns opposite the impact areas of more than 4'. Molten metal isn't molten steel, nor would either one of them or long-lasting fires in the debris be any indication of the use of incendiaries, which burn very hot for a brief period of time but also cool rapidly, and under conditions with no other fuel source would easily have been at ambient temperature within a day or two at the most. And those photos are of heavy basement-level columns, and since the collapses started at least 1000' higher, and the lowest levels were the last to go, what exactly do you think the purpose of this "thermite" was, and why on earth do you think ironworkers would have missed major steel members burned off by something besides their own acetylene torches? Again, were they "in on it," too, or just blind and stupid?
|
|
|
10:28 PM Dec 4
