Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?
streetcar304

Aldo Marquis CIT
Sep 1 2008, 05:51 PM
Stinkey
 

What I'm saying is that we should not just take certain parts of the witness testimony, disregard other parts, and call some witnesses liars based off nothing.


Yeah so?

That sure isn't something that CIT has done so why bring it up?
You took the "NOC" part of Lagasse's testimony and disregarded the "it hit the building" part.

You took the "NoC" part of Brook's testimony and disregarded the "I saw the plane just go nose dive into the Pentagon." part.

You took the "NoC" part of Boger's testimony and disregarded the "...and I just watched it hit the building" part.

You took the parts of George Aman's testimony that you liked and disregarded his "And I'm just watching and I'm just amazed that it, it happened pretty quick, too. And it hit the thing..." part.

You took the part of Robert Turcios testimony and disregarded his "...“it went in a direct line into the Pentagon—it collided.” part.

What was that part you said about not taking just certain parts and disregarding other parts? Is that like your "We never ask leading questions" thing?

Offline Profile Quote Post
Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? · Pentagon