Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?

Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?
Aldo Marquis CIT	Sep 1 2008, 05:51 PM
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	Stinkey Puh Sep 1 2008, 04:48 PM Craig Ranke If you believe the physical damage can not be caused by NoC, and you believe the plane flew NoC, you MUST believe the plane did not hit. I am not arguing that a plane hit the Pentagon because I don't think one did. Then why are you more interested in spending your time on forums splitting hairs against the research of CIT than helping to expose the deception? Quote: What I'm saying is that we should not just take certain parts of the witness testimony, disregard other parts, and call some witnesses liars based off nothing. Yeah so? That sure isn't something that CIT has done so why bring it up? Quote: If you don't have evidence or proof someone is dishonest, why are you claiming they are dishonest? Quote please. We have evidence against everyone we have claimed is dishonest. Quote: All right, can you (or any part of CIT) list the, "contradictions and dubious details" which implicate Walter, McGraw, Sucherman, Wheelhouse, and England? They are layed out in all our presentations. I don't feel like listing them all, there are too many. Please go watch them again. Quote: What exactly is it that makes you suspicious of them? 1. The very notion that they were central figures in the propaganda supporting the official story when even YOU believe the plane didn't hit meaning 9/11 was a world wide psychological back op. 2. The blatant contradictions, dubious details, questionable circumstances, and impossibilities in their accounts. 3. The NoC evidence automatically implicating anyone used to sell the official story. 4. Their strange demeanor when interviewed. Quote: If the NoC evidence implicates those people, why does it not implicate (for example) Lagasse, Brooks, or Sean Boger? Because they unwittingly expose the crime by independently corroborating each other and all the other witnesses regarding NoC. But yes we did initially consider all 3 of them suspects (as any previously published witness is) until we talked with them and they clarified their stories, they admitted errors on camera, contradictions were cleared up, and we saw how they had a relaxed honest demeanor while doing it all. If you don't believe a plane hit....you believe it was a global psychological military black op and that a lot of people lied. There is no way around it stink. Please contribute productively to the movement and work as a team to help figure out WHO the peprs really are instead of focusing on arguing against the research/evidence of CIT. If you can't even agree that the witnesses in question are "suspects" then you simply aren't interested in looking at this crime from an investigative level.
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08

Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? · Pentagon