| Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? | |
|---|---|
| Craig Ranke CIT | Sep 1 2008, 02:36 PM |
|
I SHOULD be done with you but it seems like you would have to understand how you are now completely caught in your own logic so I have to take it the next step. If you believe the physical damage can not be caused by NoC, and you believe the plane flew NoC, you MUST believe the plane did not hit. There is no escaping the logic. This implicates a psychological military black operation on an unprecedented level. THIS is the nature of the crime we are investigating. Crime investigations do not look at evidence completely out of context of the crime they are investigating. If it's a murder they look at the patterns involved from historical data regarding murders when pursuing leads. The crime we are investigating is a world wide psychological military black operation. Therefore it is reasonable to look at the crime in that context and understand how historically, operatives and assets are typically utilized to sell the story to the public and pull the operation off. If you truly believed NoC, none of this should be a leap of logic for you. It's common sense and intellectual honesty. Discuss the information in context of the crime or you are doing nothing but semantic masturbation and being disruptive to the productive team work that it will take to help expose this horrible deception. (that you claim you agree was a deception. right?) Edited by Craig Ranke CIT, Sep 1 2008, 02:37 PM.
|
 |
|
| Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? · Pentagon | |
8:58 PM Dec 2
