Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?

Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?
Stinkey Puh	Sep 1 2008, 01:58 PM
Posts: 65 Group: BANNED! Member #457 Joined: 04/01/08	Craig Ranke This statement exposes the false premise you are using as an excuse for your intellectual dishonesty. If you still actually believe a plane on the north side can cause the physical damage then you are deluding yourself. If you still actually believe that I've said a plane on the north side can cause the physical damage, then I hope you can show us a quote of it. Quote: None of our jref detractors are even willing to go there. Probably because they too figure it isn't really possible. Quote: NoC proves the witnesses were deceived in regards to the impact. I would be closer to agreeing with that if it weren't for the fact that there are multiple witnesses (IMO, too many) who do not appear to have been in a position to be deceived in regards to the impact -- and afaik they still testify that it impacted. These would include, Joel Sucherman, Stephen McGraw, Sean Boger (an NoC witness himself), and others. Quote: If you believe NoC you believe in a flyover. I am finished talking with you. That's all right.
Posts: 65 Group: BANNED! Member #457 Joined: 04/01/08

Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? · Pentagon