Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?
Stinkey Puh

Craig Ranke
 
This statement exposes the false premise you are using as an excuse for your intellectual dishonesty.

If you still actually believe a plane on the north side can cause the physical damage then you are deluding yourself.

If you still actually believe that I've said a plane on the north side can cause the physical damage, then I hope you can show us a quote of it. ;)

Quote:
 
None of our jref detractors are even willing to go there.

Probably because they too figure it isn't really possible.

Quote:
 
NoC proves the witnesses were deceived in regards to the impact.

I would be closer to agreeing with that if it weren't for the fact that there are multiple witnesses (IMO, too many) who do not appear to have been in a position to be deceived in regards to the impact -- and afaik they still testify that it impacted. These would include, Joel Sucherman, Stephen McGraw, Sean Boger (an NoC witness himself), and others.

Quote:
 
If you believe NoC you believe in a flyover.

I am finished talking with you.

That's all right.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? · Pentagon