Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?
Stinkey Puh

Craig Ranke
 
Because you are insisting on us giving you one or committing to a table created by biscuit cough.

No we are not.

Quote:
 
If you believe NoC you must believe that some witnesses were involved. There is no way around it.

Why do you think some of the witnesses had to have been involved?

Quote:
 
If you are not willing to state who you suspect of this then you have no place asking us to do the same.

Yeah, well I haven't, and I don't think Biscuit Cough has either.

Quote:
 
Why are you more concerned with who we think may have been involved rather than spreading the word about the north side approach that proves a military deception?

Why does it matter?

Quote:
 
What we "think happened" is irrelevant.

You should look at what witnesses are implicated by the NoC evidence that you have said YOU believe.

So who do you think that might be?

You don't have to worry....after all they aren't going to sue stinkey poo.

I don't have a list of "suspect" witnesses. Why does it matter? :roll: I'm not the one portraying certain witnesses as dishonest without evidence to back up my claims. After all, what evidence is there that any of the witnesses are lying?
Edited by Stinkey Puh, Aug 30 2008, 07:36 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? · Pentagon