Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?

Viewing Single Post From: Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath?
Craig Ranke CIT	Aug 30 2008, 03:59 PM
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	Stinkey Puh Aug 30 2008, 11:59 AM I don't have a list of "suspect" witnesses. Why does it matter? Because you are insisting on us giving you one or committing to a table created by biscuit cough. If you believe NoC you must believe that some witnesses were involved. There is no way around it. If you are not willing to state who you suspect of this then you have no place asking us to do the same. Since of course you agree that some witnesses had to have been involved you would serve as a more productive member of the truth movement by trying to figure out who those are rather than concentrating on what CIT says. Why are you more concerned with who we think may have been involved rather than spreading the word about the north side approach that proves a military deception? Quote: Does certain eyewitness testimony simply disagree with what you (CIT) think happened or with what you (CIT) think is possible, so you claim those witnesses are dishonest? What we "think happened" is irrelevant. You should look at what witnesses are implicated by the NoC evidence that you have said YOU believe. So who do you think that might be? You don't have to worry....after all they aren't going to sue stinkey poo.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08

Lincoln Leibner: NoC flighpath? · Pentagon