Grit1645

Aug 13 2008, 04:55 PM

SPreston

Aug 13 2008, 02:39 PM

These video analyses by David S Chandler show heavy steel pieces being hurled out from the North Tower alleged gravity collapse at 70 mph.
Further analysis identifies the origin of the ejection as about the 82nd floor, where the vertical motion of the building was no more than half that speed


These photos show heavy steel pieces being hurled up and out and away from the towers with explosive force. Some very heavy steel pieces were hurled a hundred yards into neighboring buildings in different directions. A gravity induced collapse would not produce this effect.

The vertical velocity would not necessarily have to be the same as the horizontal velocity - it would be dictated by the forces being applied to the ejected pieces. Wouldn't giant explosions producing such an effect have had giant concussions? We don't hear those on the videos. There are no concussion waves spreading out from the building.

What proof do you have that a gravity induced collapse would not produce this effect? There isn't really much to compare it to is there? Traditional controlled demolitions don't produce this effect either.