Viewing Single Post From: Pentagon Medics Thought 9/11 Attack Was a Drill

Viewing Single Post From: Pentagon Medics Thought 9/11 Attack Was a Drill
Shopnut	Jul 31 2008, 09:15 PM
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08	SPreston Jul 31 2008, 04:43 PM Because that photo just pops up years later from a source that is unverifiable. That photo is not even included in the official Defense Department Pentagon 9-11 Book. Seems like if that was real 'evidence', then the Defense Department should know about it don't you think? First they give the BS story that the fuselage nose cone of the aircraft created the inner C-Ring wall Exit Hole. Then they changed the tale to a landing gear made the Exit Hole. Is that rusty piece of junk in your photo the landing gear which allegedly created the Exit Hole? How come it is not visible in any of the early A&E Drive photos? Did it go bouncing down the A&E Drive after exiting the Exit Hole, to bounce through a doorway to hide in there waiting for Photo Ops? If it was bouncing around, then why didn't it damage the B-Ring wall? Because there was no landing gear bouncing around, because landing gear require an aircraft to break off of and there never was an aircraft impacting the Pentagon. You need to open your eyes for a change and use a little common sense. So you are saying that you have no evidence to show that the photos are not genuine? You have no measurements to show that the engine rotor at the scene does not belong to flight 77? Why wouldn't the Defense Department know about the photos you included in your post? Is there any reason to expect their book to contain every photo taken in and around the Pentagon after 9/11? There is nothing suspicious about changing stories after a large casualty such as this. As new evidence piles up and new opinions are voiced, then it is not surprising that the story would change. Unless you have more photos with dates/time taken, descriptions of the photos and whether taken before or after debris removal, you are not going to have a precise picture of the story they are supposed to tell. I have not posted any photos, so I do not know what junk you are talking about. So your line of reasoning is, "I see no landing gear in the 4 crash photos I posted, therefore there is no lading gear, therefore there was no plane. This is faulty reasoning. Edited by Shopnut, Jul 31 2008, 09:16 PM.
Posts: 222 Group: BANNED! Member #767 Joined: 07/26/08

Pentagon Medics Thought 9/11 Attack Was a Drill · Pentagon