Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Pentagon Medics Thought 9/11 Attack Was a Drill
SPreston
Member Avatar
Patriotic American
Shopnut
Jul 31 2008, 03:06 PM
SPreston
 
There is no proof that photo of the alleged 'landing gear' was even taken at the Pentagon. There is no chain of custody of that particular 'evidence'. There are no photos of those 'pieces of evidence' in their original alleged final resting places. There are no official reports nor official tags on any of those parts with serial numbers by any official experienced aircraft crash investigators. Those 'alleged parts' from Flight 77 did not cascade into that little room or corridor on their own. They could have been placed in that area weeks, even months ahead of 9-11 and the area kept locked and secret. Many of the unburned and never-riveted fuselage parts photographed outside were obviously planted evidence. The engine rotor was much too small to be from a Rolls Royce RB-211 turbofan. There was no jet fuel inside the Wedge 1 area within 50 feet of the alleged aircraft impact hole as reported by April Gallup who was there with her baby boy. She also reported no aircraft parts within her viewpoint.
Why do you think there is no chain of evidence or other reason to believe those photos are not genuine? What evidence do you have that the aircraft wreckage was planted? You are showing an intact engine and comparing it to a part with the blades no longer present. So what are the measurements of the two parts you show?
Because that photo just pops up years later from a source that is unverifiable. That photo is not even included in the official Defense Department Pentagon 9-11 Book. Seems like if that was real 'evidence', then the Defense Department should know about it don't you think? First they give the BS story that the fuselage nose cone of the aircraft created the inner C-Ring wall Exit Hole. Then they changed the tale to a landing gear made the Exit Hole. Is that rusty piece of junk in your photo the landing gear which allegedly created the Exit Hole? How come it is not visible in any of the early A&E Drive photos? Did it go bouncing down the A&E Drive after exiting the Exit Hole, to bounce through a doorway to hide in there waiting for Photo Ops? If it was bouncing around, then why didn't it damage the B-Ring wall?

Because there was no landing gear bouncing around, because landing gear require an aircraft to break off of and there never was an aircraft impacting the Pentagon. You need to open your eyes for a change and use a little common sense.

http://911files.info/77/pentagon_911_book/

Was the C-Ring Exit Hole Created With a Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kit

Unconfirmed 'evidence' - likely planted 'evidence'
Posted Image

Where is the bouncing landing gear? (Click me)
Posted Image

Where is the bouncing landing gear? (Click me)
Posted Image

Where is the bouncing landing gear?
Posted Image

http://bp2.blogger.com/_j1WCY4T_2yI/SCDGZy6NRqI/AAAAAAAACuk/UR_25xKX9j0/s1600-h/2.JPG
http://bp0.blogger.com/_j1WCY4T_2yI/R8bjF055z2I/AAAAAAAACn4/0DYeNKKUsFw/s1600-h/AE+Drive.JPG
http://bp0.blogger.com/_j1WCY4T_2yI/SCFYIC6NRyI/AAAAAAAACvk/KPpIgA7mKzo/s1600-h/paint+mark+on+a-e+wall.JPG

Where is the bouncing landing gear?
Offline Profile Quote Post
Pentagon Medics Thought 9/11 Attack Was a Drill · Pentagon