Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Pentagon Medics Thought 9/11 Attack Was a Drill
Shopnut

SPreston
Jul 31 2008, 09:56 AM
There is no proof that photo of the alleged 'landing gear' was even taken at the Pentagon. There is no chain of custody of that particular 'evidence'. There are no photos of those 'pieces of evidence' in their original alleged final resting places. There are no official reports nor official tags on any of those parts with serial numbers by any official experienced aircraft crash investigators. Those 'alleged parts' from Flight 77 did not cascade into that little room or corridor on their own. They could have been placed in that area weeks, even months ahead of 9-11 and the area kept locked and secret. Many of the unburned and never-riveted fuselage parts photographed outside were obviously planted evidence. The engine rotor was much too small to be from a Rolls Royce RB-211 turbofan. There was no jet fuel inside the Wedge 1 area within 50 feet of the alleged aircraft impact hole as reported by April Gallup who was there with her baby boy. She also reported no aircraft parts within her viewpoint.
Why do you think there is no chain of evidence or other reason to believe those photos are not genuine? What evidence do you have that the aircraft wreckage was planted? You are showing an intact engine and comparing it to a part with the blades no longer present. So what are the measurements of the two parts you show?

As far as I know, April Gallup has never said an aircraft did not hit the Pentagon. Failure to recognize certain details as she was evacuated (with serious injuries) is not good evidence that aircraft parts and fuel were not present. Can you show me one statement she made; that says she does not believe an aircraft crashed into the Pentagon?
Offline Profile Quote Post
Pentagon Medics Thought 9/11 Attack Was a Drill · Pentagon