Viewing Single Post From: Barry Jennings 2007 LCFC UnCut Interview

Viewing Single Post From: Barry Jennings 2007 LCFC UnCut Interview
Tether	Jul 21 2008, 04:16 PM
Posts: 107 Group: BANNED! Member #129 Joined: 01/19/08	I know you're just dying to joust with someone, so I'll chime in and discuss one point at a time. Quote: NIST on the other hand, has a big problem fitting into their theory, a very destructive explosion occurring below the 6th floor of WTC7 prior to the collapses of the WTC Twin Towers. There is video inside WTC7 after the collapse of the first tower, and I don't see any signs of a huge explosion other than some dust and a few broken windows, which most certainly looks more like the result of the tower collapse. We see evidence that no explosion took place other than what Barry has to say. No other person says anything about a huge explosion prior to the first tower collapse, other than Barry. It seems quite likely that NIST is correct, and Barry is wrong, so why is it that NIST should have any inclination to fit an explosion into the scenerio, when everything points to there being no explosion at all? Edited by Tether, Jul 21 2008, 04:19 PM.
Posts: 107 Group: BANNED! Member #129 Joined: 01/19/08

Barry Jennings 2007 LCFC UnCut Interview · WTC 7