Viewing Single Post From: Double standards

Viewing Single Post From: Double standards
jim1029	Jul 5 2008, 04:39 PM
Posts: 1 Group: Members Member #710 Joined: 07/05/08	Hello, I am a "skeptic". I do not know a ton about this conspiracy theory, so sorry if this has already been answered. Referring to the towers, many people have said that fire has never caused steel-frame buildings to collapse. This is shown as "proof" that the government explanation must not be true. (I cannot back up or refute that claim, as I am not at all qualified to do so). The claim is that explosives were used instead. However, there has never been a demolition large enough to take down even one of the towers, let alone both of them. So how am I supposed to believe your explanation, if there is no precedent for either of them? Not to mention, the impact of the plane would have without a doubt severly damaged the building by itself. Also, other people have said things along the lines of "If the government is telling the truth, then why are they afraid to release x video proving it?" Well, think about this. The government has many classified files. Possibly none of them are as important or as major as what happened on 9/11. So why would they release the classified files for 9/11, and not declassify several other, not very important files? Plus, you could argue that they already have with the 9/11 Report.
Posts: 1 Group: Members Member #710 Joined: 07/05/08

Double standards · Skeptics