| Viewing Single Post From: Loose Change: Final Cut | |
|---|---|
| Headspin | Jul 2 2008, 05:00 PM |
|
The official account states the building fell from fire and damage, so if you believe the official account then the amount of explosives required is zero, if explosives were used to bring the towers down then the amount would be any amount above zero, right? in other words, massive amounts of explosives would make demolition unrealistic so therefore the official account (using zero explosives) is validated, is not a logical argument. It is therefore only necessary to identitfy the presence of explosives, not the quantity. to make it look like the plane damage caused the collapse. For the towers, if explosives detonated in sequence from the top down then that would not be the case. WTC7 did fall from the bottom. depends on the footage, but most collapse footage was filmed from very far away, individual explosions would not necessarily be distinguishable on those distant shots. maybe smelly explosives were not used. Professor Jones has found reacted thermite residue and unreacted nanothermite compound, there would be no identifiable smell. some of your questions are addressed here: http://www.explosive911analysis.com/ Edited by Headspin, Jul 3 2008, 04:31 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Loose Change: Final Cut · Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup | |




11:41 AM Dec 6