| Viewing Single Post From: Loose Change: Final Cut | |
|---|---|
| look-up | Jul 2 2008, 02:26 PM |
|
Welcome Kate, I'll attempt to answer some of these. Keep in mind that you may be making many assumptions about 9/11 truthers based on talking points you've been handed by mainstream sources, who attempt to discredit and insult us.
Because they are very likely dead. If not killed by plane crashes (and no one really knows for sure) then killed after the fact in another fashion. I don't know anyone who really thinks they are alive. It would be kind of difficult to track down someone who no longer exists.
Good question. Again you are assuming we should know something we cannot possibly know. All we are saying is that the building could not have come down in the manner it did, without assistance. A search is underway to identify the devices which were used, however, it is not necessary to identify them for us to know that something was in fact used.
Probably many locations. The molten metal in the basement levels of the structures (all three of them) indicates that the steel in the base of the cores was melted by something. Removing the core from the bedrock is probably the biggest thing that needed to be done before the rest would fall.
Because it was a psychological attack against us, not a classical controlled demolition. If they wanted to make it go top-down, that is certainly feasible to do, it's just not common or "normal". Yet 9/11 was very far from normal. What we ask is that people start with the supposition that they were intended to believe it was not a C.D., and therefore the demolition needed to look like it was not a demolition. But as you'll see if you research it, it ended up giving some clues that it was assisted anyhow. Also, I'd like to point out the logical fallacy which people often emply. They believe that because the collapse did not perfectly resemble other demolitions, that it could not possible be one. Yet, most of the similarities are there, except for the top-down part and the ejection of debris. Explosives can do many different things. They can very neatly break the base of a tower and them bring them down nicely, or they can be set up in a fashion which would make them explode outward from top-down.
Because there was a rumble, and the cameras were at a distance. If you slow-mo some of the collapse videos, you'll see wave after wave of explosions top-down. Those from a distance would seem like a rumble especially with debris collapsing around as it happened. Many explosive-like noises were heard by people in and around the tower long before collapse. Could those have been in preparation for the final demo sequence?
Because most of the people who might have been able to tell this story were probably blown to bits by the devices. I know, this is a very morbid thing to discuss. I wish we didn't need to, but we do. Tiny bone fragments were found years later ontop of the neighboring buildings. How could a building which collapsed from fire and gravity alone shatter human remains into tiny fragments and send them hundreds of yards latterally?
Hey we enjoy newcomers who are respectful. We actually don't get very many who are. Remember, most of your questions can be answered in the short-term with "well I would really like to know that too, that's why we are here." |
 |
|
| Loose Change: Final Cut · Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup | |
8:41 PM Dec 2
