Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Chemerinsky's latest
Topic Started: Apr 21 2017, 09:17 AM (80 Views)
Quasimodo

Quote:
 
http://www.libertylawsite.org/2017/04/21/whining-about-article-iii/

April 21, 2017
Closing the Courthouse Door, Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Courts
Whining About Article III

The latest tract by Erwin Chemerinsky, liberal law professor and dean of the University of California at Irvine School of Law, is depressingly familiar. Like his Enhancing Government: Federalism for the 21st Century (2008), The Conservative Assault on the Constitution (2011), and The Case Against the Supreme Court (2014), his new book is a diatribe masquerading as legal scholarship. The usual villains—conservative Supreme Court justices, malevolent government officials, rapacious corporations, racist police officers—are pitted against the wrongly accused, helpless consumers, and oppressed victims of discrimination.

Closing the Courthouse Door: How Your Constitutional Rights Became Unenforceable
presents one-sided vignettes drawn from actual cases, with factual nuances omitted to achieve the desired degree of caricature. With his straw men thus erected, Chemerinsky proceeds to tear them down, all the while claiming to expose the treachery of the evil-doers du jour. According to him, the only things standing between innocent citizens and despotism are Progressive federal judges and the protections of the living Constitution they enforce.

(snip)

None of these grievances can fairly be blamed on “conservative justices.” The fact is that the various Supreme Court decisions Chemerinsky complains about have only one thing in common: the side he was rooting for did not prevail. In his liberal mind, that means that the applicable law is wrong and should be changed to open the courthouse doors—some would say floodgates—to all comers. This is nothing but results-oriented sophistry.

In the book’s final few pages, the author airily brushes aside the countervailing considerations, which he summarizes under the headings “Too Much Power in the Federal Courts?” and “Is It All a Quest for Liberal Results?” Not surprisingly, the answer to both questions is a passionate no.

Three years ago, Chemerinsky revealingly lamented that he hoped his then-latest book would not be perceived as a “liberal’s whining that the Court’s decisions have not been liberal enough.” That about sums up his point of view, though. Closing the Courthouse Door amounts to an extended whine about Article III.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quasimodo

Quote:
 
malevolent government officials, rapacious corporations, racist police officers—are pitted against the wrongly accused, helpless consumers, and oppressed victims of discrimination.


Chemerinsky might actually have some points to make; but his failure (moral, imho) to take a stand against
the Nifong prosecution (or if so, in any meaningful way), rather rob him of the authority needed to comment
on reforming our judicial system.

(MOO)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Walt-in-Durham

Quasimodo
Apr 21 2017, 09:18 AM
Chemerinsky might actually have some points to make; but his failure (moral, imho) to take a stand against
the Nifong prosecution (or if so, in any meaningful way), rather rob him of the authority needed to comment
on reforming our judicial system.

(MOO)
Ding - Ding - Ding, Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner.

Walt-in-Durham
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic »
Add Reply