| Nat. Org of Women says Palin doesn't represent; Women! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 6 2008, 12:00 AM (374 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Sep 6 2008, 12:00 AM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
. The National Organization for Women stated today, in regard to Sarah Palin, that not all women represent women - not all women speak for women. I found this an unbelievable statement. Another prominent Democrat today said that Sarah Palin is "repulsive." Sorry if this has already been posted. |
|
|
| genny6348 | Sep 6 2008, 12:25 AM Post #2 |
|
Genny6348
|
Gloria Steinem seems to think she speaks for all women though. http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-steinem4-2008sep04,0,1290251.story Having both a family and a career is something they couldn't imagine, so any woman who does it all really ticks them off. She immediately refers her to Phyllis Schaffley only younger trying to mark Palin as being 'radical'. |
![]() |
|
| Baldo | Sep 6 2008, 01:38 AM Post #3 |
|
Sarah is kicking ass and we are taking names! She is already at Icon status. |
![]() |
|
| Tidbits | Sep 6 2008, 03:47 AM Post #4 |
|
Sarah wears a shirt that rejects the claim that she is not a babe.![]() |
![]() |
|
| brittany | Sep 6 2008, 06:42 AM Post #5 |
|
Who is this prominent democrat??? |
![]() |
|
| Jezebelle | Sep 6 2008, 06:53 AM Post #6 |
|
tid, please, enough already with the pink T-shirt photo.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sep 6 2008, 08:46 AM Post #7 |
|
Deleted User
|
I am not certain, but I believe it was the Mayor of Philadelphia. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Sep 6 2008, 08:48 AM Post #8 |
|
Deleted User
|
I second that motion. There were a lot of pictures, 500 to be exact, yesterday on line of the convention, Sarah, McCain, family, etc. Some of the pictures of Sarah were close-up shots. She is absolutely beautiful. She has a great complexion, beautiful expressive eyes, etc. Maybe we can find one of those shots. |
|
|
| Soobs | Sep 6 2008, 08:57 AM Post #9 |
|
Well, as a woman, I can say Steinem and NOW don't speak for me. It's amazing how transparent they are about their own agendas. I wonder if they realize that the rest of the country knows this about them. |
![]() |
|
| Tidbits | Sep 6 2008, 12:51 PM Post #10 |
|
It is posted for the words on the shirt and twinkle in the eye. Ignore the rest. |
![]() |
|
| Sarah | Sep 6 2008, 12:56 PM Post #11 |
|
Sarah Palin is receiving the same treatment from feminists which Margaret Thatcher did in the 1980's, they hate her for being the wrong type of woman. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Sep 6 2008, 08:18 PM Post #12 |
|
Deleted User
|
. Yeah, but they claim they aren't really women too. They are truly questioning the authenticity of certain woman. The calls on the Left blogs immediately after Palin was announced as the candidate were - she's a Man without a Penis. Just a week before the same people were championing Hillary Clinton for showing our daughters and sons that a woman can be anything in the USA. Quite a departure. |
|
|
| chatham | Sep 6 2008, 08:40 PM Post #13 |
|
The way I could tell Margaret Thatcher was a woman was by the dress she had on. The same with Golda Meir. It is much harder to tell a woman feminist from one of those cheaters at the olympics who get banned every year because they dont pass the sex test. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic » |








7:25 PM Jul 10