| UVA Rape Story Collapses; Duke Lacrosse Redux | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 5 2014, 01:45 PM (60,447 Views) | |
| foxglove | Mar 26 2015, 06:31 PM Post #841 |
|
Great post! It seems Sullivan cares more about keeping her career than being an honest, objective leader. |
![]() |
|
| Joan Foster | Mar 26 2015, 06:38 PM Post #842 |
|
Fantastic piece of writing, Bill. I might add...as always! |
![]() |
|
| foxglove | Mar 26 2015, 06:49 PM Post #843 |
|
This is not the first time that interest groups have used suseptible women to advance causes. http://www.wnd.com/2001/02/8054/#! The real 'Jane Roe' Famed abortion lawsuit plaintiff says uncaring attorneys 'used' her The name “Jane Roe” has become synonymous with “abortion.” It is revered by those who call themselves “pro-choice” and strikes a chord of sorrow in “pro-life” camps. And though Roe v. Wade has been cited and debated countless times in the nearly 30 years since its decision by the Supreme Court, Jane Roe, the famous plaintiff, has been all but forgotten. A Christian since her conversion in 1995, Roe’s real name is Norma McCorvey, and her life is dedicated to her ministry called “Roe No More.” In an exclusive interview with WorldNetDaily last week, McCorvey shared her life story and explained how she was “used” by pro-abortion attorneys in their quest to legalize the procedure. At the age of 21, McCorvey was pregnant with her third child. She had given her other two children up for adoption and McCorvey did not want to say goodbye to her offspring a third time. She decided to have an illegal abortion, but the Dallas clinic she went to had been recently raided and shut down. So McCorvey made up a story — she had been raped, she told her doctor and two lawyers. She signed an affidavit on condition of anonymity, and the lawsuit began. “After finding myself pregnant,” McCorvey told WorldNetDaily, “I considered abortion and, because of this, I was put in touch with two attorneys, Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee. They had just recently graduated from law school and were interested in challenging the Texas abortion statute.” Describing how she was viewed by the pro-abortion community, McCorvey said, “Plain and simple, I was used. I was a nobody to them. They only needed a pregnant woman to use for their case, and that is it. They cared, not about me, but only about legalizing abortion. Even after the case, I was never respected — probably because I was not an ivy-league educated, liberal feminist like they were.” Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2001/02/8054/#ffqOEp4iHMxAwZoJ.99 |
![]() |
|
| MikeZPU | Mar 26 2015, 10:53 PM Post #844 |
|
Second what Joan said
|
![]() |
|
| Joan Foster | Mar 27 2015, 11:32 AM Post #845 |
|
By DYLAN BYERS | 3/27/15 12:11 PM EDT The highly anticipated review of Rolling Stone's disputed story about a University of Virginia gang rape was submitted to the magazine this week, the On Media blog has learned, and its contents are apparently quite damning. The review, which was submitted by Columbia Journalism School dean Steve Coll, is significantly longer than the original 9,000-word article, sources with knowledge of its contents said. They also said the review offered a blunt indictment of Rolling Stone's reporting and its violation of journalism ethics. A significant portion of the review is slated to run in the magazine next month, they said. The review was commissioned by Rolling Stone editor and publisher Jann Wenner in December, following criticism of a November story that opened with an account of the brutal gang rape of a UVA student identified only as "Jackie." The article's author, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, did not reach out to the alleged assaulters prior to the article's publication. The magazine has since issued a statement apologizing "to anyone who was affected by the story." Earlier this month, police in Charlottesville, the home of UVA, suspended their investigation into the alleged assault, stating that they "we’re not able to conclude to any substantive degree that an incident consistent with the facts contained in that article occurred." “That doesn’t mean that something terrible didn’t happen to Jackie," Charlottesville Police Chief Timothy Longo said, referring to the alleged victim by her pseudonym. "We are just unable to gather sufficient facts to conclude what that something may have been. So this case is not closed. It’s suspended until such time that we’re able to gather more information or until sometime someone comes forward and provides us with more information." Neither Coll nor Kathryn Brenner, the director of communications at Wenner Media, responded to repeated requests for comment. |
![]() |
|
| abb | Mar 28 2015, 05:01 AM Post #846 |
|
http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/27/uva-rape-hoax-the-lawsuits-against-rolling-stone-will-be-awesome/ UVA Rape Hoax: The Lawsuits Against Rolling Stone Will Be AWESOME 1:52 PM 03/27/2015 Jim Treacher Blogger Have a good weekend, Jann Wenner. Those of us who still care about the truth sure will. Dylan Byers, Politico: The highly anticipated review of Rolling Stone’s disputed story about a University of Virginia gang rape was submitted to the magazine this week, the On Media blog has learned, and its contents are apparently quite damning. The review, which was submitted by Columbia Journalism School dean Steve Coll, is significantly longer than the original 9,000-word article, sources with knowledge of its contents said. They also said the review offered a blunt indictment of Rolling Stone’s reporting and its violation of journalism ethics… The magazine has since issued a statement apologizing “to anyone who was affected by the story.” Because nothing indicates a sincere apology quite like the passive voice. Rolling Stone published a huge, elaborate, deeply ugly lie. And they would’ve gotten away with it, too, if not for those meddling bloggers! Now that the truth has been revealed, with even more to come, I hope the victims of this crime squeeze that crappy magazine for every penny they can get. These guys can’t get their reputations back, but they can damn sure take a strip out of Jann Wenner’s leathery hide. |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Mar 28 2015, 07:18 AM Post #847 |
|
Sorry, but based on experience, I think they won't be... |
![]() |
|
| abb | Mar 30 2015, 04:37 AM Post #848 |
|
http://www.roanoke.com/news/education/higher_education/uva-to-address-sexual-assault-by-trying-to-change-culture/article_e6e6e644-1265-55b6-b446-378cf3fa827c.html UVa to address sexual assault by trying to change culture By Derek Quizon The (Charlottesville) Daily Progress | Posted: Sunday, March 29, 2015 8:00 pm November’s Rolling Stone article about sexual assault at the University of Virginia took another hit last week as Charlottesville police announced there was no evidence to support the gang rape described in graphic detail by writer Sabrina Ruben Erdely. But the debate over how to deal with sexual misconduct at UVa is still very much alive. The administration under President Teresa Sullivan has commissioned working groups — composed of students, staff, faculty and alumni — to find ways to better deal with the problem at every level. For victims’ advocates, this is an important moment for the university — a chance to implement policies that could bring about the cultural changes they’d like to see. “A lot of it is changing the mindset,” said Rebecca Weybright, director of the Sexual Assault Resource Agency in Charlottesville. “We have to change the mindset of the victim asking for it; we have to start looking at why did the perpetrator think this was OK.” Although the Rolling Stone article has fallen apart under scrutiny, most of UVa’s leadership agree there’s a problem with sexual assault on Grounds. On some level, the university has been wrestling with it for years. UVa has been under investigation by the U.S. Department of Education since 2011, and is currently one of 55 schools being scrutinized by the department’s Office of Civil Rights. The inquiry was sparked by a former student who said staff members botched the investigation of a rape she reported by, among other things, losing crucial physical evidence in the case. In December, the university released a list of sexual assault policy changes, including outlining procedures for preserving evidence, and retaining sexual assault nurse examiners in the Emergency Department of the Medical Center to conduct forensic tests. But advocates like Weybright and alumna Leora Tanjuatco said the most important reforms are the ones that could help change students’ attitudes toward assault. Although the reforms implemented by UVa “seem close to idea … from a cultural perspective, it’s still a place where girls complain about being required to show their IDs at frat parties, ‘because Jackie lied,’ ” Tanjuatco said, referring to an anonymous source in Erdely’s story who claimed she was gang raped by fraternity members. Is it possible to change culture from a top-down perspective? Tanjuatco said the right educational programs could push things in the right direction. She’s part of a group of alumni petitioning the university for a mandatory, once-a-semester training program covering the basic policies and procedures of the university’s Sexual Misconduct Board, healthy relationships and bystander intervention. UVa offers a lot of this information in awareness campaigns, but Tanjuatco said that doesn’t reach a wide enough audience. “Events like Take Back the Night are a small portion of the population,” she said, referring to the annual walk for sexual assault awareness. Making a real change on Grounds would mean “forcing the conversation, which is why we want it to be mandatory,” she said. UVa’s leadership also recognizes the importance of reaching out to students. One of Sullivan’s workgroups focuses on culture and climate, and at a recent town hall, members and attendees shared ideas about education and outreach. One recurring theme in the discussions was the need to provide first-year students with more guidance from staff and older students. About 84 percent of campus sexual assaults occur during the victim’s first four semesters, according to a 2007 survey by the National Institute of Justice, with more than half of them occurring in the first three months of the academic year. Pairing first-year students with a mentor could be one way to reduce risk, said Sharon Davie, director of the university’s Women’s Center. “There’s such a wealth of knowledge among older students,” she said at the town hall meeting earlier this month. “The older students have had so much experience and the first-years are so vulnerable.” The university also will be participating in a nationwide survey on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment on Grounds, which administrators hope will give them a better handle on the problem. Different training models have been discussed, including an online training module similar to the one used at the University of Montana. Weybright said that however it’s delivered, training at UVa should teach members of the university community about their individual responsibility in preventing assault and helping victims. “Not everyone has to buy into the bigger cultural change, but we have to look at what is our role to stop sexual violence,” she said. |
![]() |
|
| cks | Mar 30 2015, 05:00 AM Post #849 |
|
My guess is that such programs will receive about as much attention as the alcohol "awareness" programs that many schools have students attend as part of the orientation process at universities. I remember my own children stating how students either slept through such programs or (if on line) rushed through them so to get them done........or told each other the correct responses to the questions one had to answer. As I see it, much of the problem stems from drinking.......I still maintain that the raising of the drinking age was a HUGE mistake. It is for this reason that I am a supporter of the Amethyst Initiative. Also, as a woman, I resent the implication of many of those (like Sullivan) who somehow on the one hand claim that women and men are equal but when drunk it is only the male who must be at all times in the position of responsibility for his actions - that females are weak and get a pass. |
![]() |
|
| comelately | Mar 30 2015, 06:08 AM Post #850 |
|
A (very smart) student working with me described the indoctrination session during his orientation as "Straight out of North Korea". Among other entertainment, a lady (this is not how he referred to her) tried to tell them how to behave during and around sex. As he put it, "Perhaps she should have tried it before trying to teach others about it". |
![]() |
|
| Quasimodo | Mar 30 2015, 07:09 AM Post #851 |
|
Exactly what I was thinking: the Party Line, being given by the Party cadre... |
![]() |
|
| abb | Mar 30 2015, 06:57 PM Post #852 |
|
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/03/30/the_uva_case_and_rape-hoax_denial_126087.html The UVA Case and Rape-Hoax Denial By Cathy Young - March 30, 2015 Four months after Rolling Stone magazine published a shocking—and soon discredited—account of a fraternity gang rape at the University of Virginia, the Charlottesville police department has released the results of its investigation into the alleged assault. It comes as no surprise that “no substantive basis” was found for the claim by a student known as “Jackie” that she was raped by seven men at a fraternity party as a UVA freshman in September 2012. What’s striking is to what lengths both the police and many in the news media have gone to tiptoe around the obvious fact that the tale was a hoax by a serial liar. This dance of denial suggests that in the current ideological climate, it is nearly impossible to declare any allegation of rape to be definitely false. At the press conference, Charlottesville Police Chief Timothy J. Longo stressed that the department’s conclusion “doesn’t mean something terrible didn’t happen to Jackie” and that the investigation is not closed but only suspended until new evidence emerges. It is, of course, nearly impossible to prove a negative. Short of a surveillance tape documenting Jackie’s every movement, one cannot know for certain that she was never sexually assaulted at UVA. But the evidence against her is damning. It’s not simply that there was no party at Phi Kappa Si, the fraternity named by Jackie, anywhere near the time when she said she was attacked. It’s not simply that her account changed from forced oral sex to vaginal rape and from five assailants to seven, or that her friends saw no sign of her injuries after the alleged assault. What clinches the case is the overwhelming proof that “Drew,” Jackie’s date who supposedly orchestrated her rape, was Jackie’s own invention. Back in the fall of 2012, Jackie’s friends knew “Drew” as “Haven Monahan,” an upperclassman who supposedly wanted to date her and with whom she encouraged them to exchange emails and text messages. However, an investigation by The Washington Post and other media last December found that “Haven’s” messages were fake; the phone numbers he used were registered to online services that allow texting via the Internet and redirecting calls, while his photo matches a former high school classmate of Jackie’s who lives in a different state. No “Haven Monahan” exists on the UVA campus or, apparently, anywhere in the United States (at least outside romance novels). The catfishing scheme seems to have been a ploy to get the attention of a male friend on whom Jackie had a crush—the same friend she called for help after the alleged assault. Is it possible that someone sexually assaulted Jackie on the night when she claimed to be going out with her fictional suitor? Theoretically, yes. But it’s also clear that her credibility is as non-existent as “Haven Monahan.” Moreover, the police investigation has debunked another one of Jackie’s claims: that in spring 2014, when she was already an anti-rape activist, some men harassed her in the street off-campus and threw a bottle that hit her face and (improbably) broke. Jackie said that her roommate picked glass out of a cut on her face; but the roommate disputes this and describes the injury as a scrape, likely from a fall. Jackie also said she called her mother immediately after that attack, but phone records show no such call. Despite all this, Chief Longo wouldn’t call Jackie’s story a false allegation and even referred to her as “this survivor” (though amending it to the more neutral “or this complaining party”). Meanwhile, in the CNN report on the March 23 press conference, anchor Brooke Baldwin, correspondent Sara Ganim and legal analyst Sunny Hostin were tripping over each other to assert that “we have to be very careful” not to brand Jackie a liar and that “she could have been sexually assaulted.” Hostin argued that the idea that Jackie made it all up “flies in the face of statistics,” because “only about 2 percent of rapes that are reported are false.” This is a bogus statistic, which Hostin misattributed to the FBI. (According to FBI data, 8 to 9 percent of police reports of sexual assault are dismissed as “unfounded”; the reality of false rape reports is far more complicated, and it’s almost impossible to get a reliable estimate.) Even if it were true, it would say nothing about Jackie’s specific case. What’s more, statistics on false allegations generally refer to police reports or at least formal administrative complaints at a college—neither of which Jackie was willing to file. CNN never mentioned the evidence that Jackie fabricated “Haven Monahan.” Neither did the New York Times, which said only that “the police were unable to track Mr. Monahan down.” Jackie’s defenders argue that rape victims often change their stories because their recall is affected by trauma. It is true that memory, not just of traumatic events, can be unreliable; a victim may at various points give somewhat different descriptions of the offender or the attack. It is also true that, as writer Jessica Valenti argues, someone who tells the truth about being raped may lie to cover up embarrassing details (such as going to the rapist’s apartment to buy drugs). None of that, however, requires us to suspend rational judgment and pretend that Jackie’s story is anything other than a fabrication. While Jackie is probably more troubled than malevolent, she is not the victim here. If there’s a victim, it’s Phi Kappa Si, the fraternity branded a nest of rapists, suspended and targeted for vandalism—as well as UVA Dean Nicole Eramo, whom the Rolling Stone story painted as a callous bureaucrat indifferent to Jackie’s plight. In this case, at least, there were no specific accused men. But the extreme reluctance to close a rape investigation and call a lie a lie bodes ill for wrongly accused individuals, who may find themselves under a cloud of suspicion even after all the facts exonerate them. Evading the facts does a disservice to Jackie, too. In a sane environment, she would face disciplinary charges and perhaps mandatory counseling. In a climate where saying that a woman is lying about rape is tantamount to “victim-blaming” and “rape culture”—and where some of Jackie’s fellow students say that even if her story “wasn’t completely true,” it helped bring attention to important issues—she is likely to remain mired in self-destructive false victimhood. For the rest of us, this episode shows how extreme and irrational “rape culture” dogma has become, and how urgent it is to break its hold on public discourse. The current moral panic may be an overreaction to real problems of failure to support victims of sexual violence. But when truth becomes heresy, the pendulum has swung too far, with disastrous consequences for civil rights and basic justice. Cathy Young writes a weekly column for RealClearPolitics and is also a contributing editor at Reason magazine. She blogs at http://cathyyoung.wordpress.com/ and you can follow her on Twitter at @CathyYoung63. She can be reached by email at CathyYoung63@gmail.com. |
![]() |
|
| abb | Mar 31 2015, 04:25 AM Post #853 |
|
http://www.dailyprogress.com/news/local/uva/assessment-of-rolling-stone-article-set-to-be-released-april/article_fa14f63e-d753-11e4-9fee-fb56016467b8.html Assessment of Rolling Stone article set to be released April 8 By Derek Quizon | Posted: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:13 pm The Columbia Journalism Review plans a week from Wednesday to release a report on Rolling Stone’s work in the shattered tale of gang rape at a University of Virginia fraternity. Commissioned by Jann S. Wenner, editor and publisher of Rolling Stone, the independent review will be made public April 8, Columbia University spokesman Sabina Lee said Monday. Columbia would not elaborate on the content of the report, and neither Rolling Stone nor Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the contributing editor who authored the 9,000-word story, returned calls Monday. Politico’s Dylan Byers has reported that the review has been submitted to the magazine and is longer than the original story and “damning.” While Columbia Journalism School professor Helen Benedict defended the story shortly before it fell apart, the Columbia Journalism Review repeatedly has taken the magazine to task, pillorying the expose as one of the worst pieces of journalism in 2014. Headlined “A Rape on Campus,” the Nov. 19 story graphically described a woman identified only as “Jackie” being raped by seven men in an upstairs room at the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house. But the story crumbled under scrutiny. The magazine issued a Dec. 5 apology, saying it had found discrepancies in Jackie’s account. Her friends disputed the story and a police investigation turned up no evidence to back it. What impact Columbia’s review might have on Phi Psi’s consideration of legal action against the magazine is unknown. “We’re following it with interest,” Ben Warthen, the fraternity’s Richmond-based lawyer, said Monday, declining to comment further. Even with the threat of a lawsuit, Rolling Stone might have been wise to ask for the report, said Dave Heller, deputy director of the Media Law Resource Center in New York City. The editors might view it as an important step toward restoring the magazine’s credibility. “Thus, fully airing the facts and circumstances of how the article was researched and published — including all the shortcomings — may be a useful and even necessary step to repairing the magazine’s reputation with its readers,” Heller said. Chief among the story’s shortcomings was Erdely’s failure to approach the men “Jackie” accused of attacking her, according to critics, including the Columbia Journalism Review. “Reporter Sabrina Rubin Erdely didn’t contact the alleged perpetrators of Jackie’s rape, not to mention three of her friends portrayed as unsympathetic to it,” wrote Dave Uberti, who covers media and politics for the Review, which is published monthly by the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism. Benedict, however, told the New York Times in early December that a reporter writing a story about a university accused of failing to address the mugging or robbery of a student “would not be expected to interview the alleged mugger or robber.” In the case of Erdely’s story, however, the failure to seek out alleged perpetrators proved problematic. Investigating the account’s claims at the request of UVa President Teresa A. Sullivan, Charlottesville police sought the man described as leading Jackie into the attack but could find no proof he even existed. Investigators interviewed some 70 people. City Police Chief Timothy J. Longo announced last week that his department had suspended its five-month investigation into the matter. The city police report on the probe concluded: “There is no substantive basis to support the account alleged in the Rolling Stone article.” |
![]() |
|
| Joan Foster | Mar 31 2015, 05:03 PM Post #854 |
|
By now it's clear that the brutal gang rape reported last November in Rolling Stone did not occur. I write that, knowing full well the backlash I could receive from not adding the caveat that something could still have happened to Jackie, the accuser in the story. Activists have clung to the idea that something probably did happen to make a young woman tell a tale of a brutal gang rape and become a campus activist to keep the hoax claims isolated to a small subset. These same activists bent over backwards following the Charlottesville Police press conference last week to claim that Jackie probably wasn't lying, because such a false accusation "flies in the face of statistics," as one CNN panelist said. Of course, the statistic that only 2 percent of reported rapes are false – doubtful anyway – only applies to rapes actually reported to police, which this one was not. But in any event, the faint possibility that Jackie may have suffered some other horrific event is not the reason this story will not be labeled a hoax by activists or most in the mainstream media. No, the reason it will not be labeled a hoax comes from an anonymous McGill University student, using the pseudonym Aurora Dagny, who wrote last year that dogmatism is in part to blame for activists' refusal to accept evidence contrary to their worldview. "One way to define the difference between a regular belief and a sacred belief is that people who hold sacred beliefs think it is morally wrong for anyone to question those beliefs," Dagny wrote. "If someone does question those beliefs, they're not just being stupid or even depraved, they're actively doing violence. They might as well be kicking a puppy. When people hold sacred beliefs, there is no disagreement without animosity." Because the activists behind the Rolling Stone story hold a "sacred belief" that thousands, perhaps even millions, of college students are sexually assaulted each year, any evidence to the contrary is seen as detrimental to the cause. It's why Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., was able to continue calling Jackie a "victim" of a crime for which there is no proof. It's why the University of Virginia's president, Teresa Sullivan, and those responsible for vandalizing the fraternity named in the Rolling Stone article have not had to apologize for their rush to judgment. And it's why Jackie won't have to answer for the money and time spent by the police investigating her false accusation. "In a sane environment, she would face disciplinary charges and perhaps mandatory counseling," Cathy Young wrote at RealClearPolitics. "In a climate where saying that a woman is lying about rape is tantamount to 'victim-blaming' and 'rape culture' — and where some of Jackie's fellow students say that even if her story 'wasn't completely true,' it helped bring attention to important issues — she is likely to remain mired in self-destructive false victimhood." The refusal to call the episode the hoax it is might be good for activists who can't handle the questioning of the doctrine that rape accusers must never be questioned, even when their story sounds too fantastical. But it is not good for real victims, the falsely accused or even the false accusers themselves. Edited by Joan Foster, Mar 31 2015, 05:05 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| abb | Apr 2 2015, 03:55 AM Post #855 |
|
http://www.cavalierdaily.com/article/2015/04/due-process-title-ix-campus-sexual-misconduct-panel-held Due process, Title IX, campus sexual misconduct panel held Student Council retracts event sponsorship by Katherine Ballington | Apr 01 2015 | 5 hours ago nsabeaxlerabelfort Ashley Belfort | The Cavalier Daily Incoming Student Council President Abraham Axler said he was not intimately involved in the process of formulating the panel, but he did help balance the board where views were lacking. A panel on due process, Title IX and campus sexual misconduct was held at the Caplin Pavilion at the University Law School Wednesday evening. After concerns about poor representation on the panel, Student Council decided yesterday to no longer sponsor the event. Student Council President-elect Abe Axler, a second-year College student, said he was not intimately involved in the process of formulating the panel, but he did help balance the board where views were lacking. “Yesterday I was getting a lot of really concerned emails about the composition of the panel,” Axler said. “It was troublesome that it was very one-sided with people who were not very reflective of the most rigorous academic conversation.” Axler said when Student Council realized the panel did not fairly represent a viewpoint in favor of Title IX or University processes for handling campus violence, there were three speakers on the panel. The first speaker was Heather MacDonald from the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. She has written many articles, including “The Campus Rape Myth,” for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. The second speaker was Stuart Taylor from the Brookings Institution. He is a freelance journalist who focuses on legal and policy issues. He coauthored a book titled “Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustice of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case.” The last speaker was Susan Kruth from the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, an organization with the mission of defending the individual rights on America’s colleges and campuses. Axler said Student Council realized the panel was missing a feminist viewpoint, which needed to be balanced. Because the panel date was quickly approaching, Axler said he acknowledged the difficulty in finding a feminist legal theorist to bring diversity of thought to the panel. Axler asked University alumna Emily Renda, project coordinator for the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs, to speak on the panel. Renda is well known throughout the University community for her involvement in sexual assault prevention and awareness. Last year, she was the co-chair of the Sexual Assault Leadership Council. “I called Emily Renda, a known feminist and asked her to join the panel,” Axler said. “There were concerns whether this was still enough.” Axler said in light of recent events at the University, this conversation is a necessary one, whether or not Student Council offers direct sponsorship. “It was still an important conversation to have about due process. We [StudCo] just were not confident in getting 100 percent behind it.” |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DUKE LACROSSE - Liestoppers · Next Topic » |







9:15 AM Jul 11