Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Healthcare Bill Part III; Obamacare
Topic Started: Mar 3 2014, 02:20 PM (48,626 Views)
LTC8K6
Member Avatar
Assistant to The Devil Himself
http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/11/yet-another-video-emerges-of-obamacare-architect-calling-americans-stupid-video/

Yet Another Video Emerges Of Obamacare Architect Calling Americans ‘Stupid’
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Baldo
Nov 11 2014, 11:06 PM
Krauthammer: ObamaCare Architect Remarks 'True Voice of Liberal Arrogance'

On Tuesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer reacted to ObamaCare architect Jonathan Gruber’s ill-advised remarks in which he declared voters too disengaged with the crafting and ultimate passage of ObamaCare – something he described as a political advantage.

Krauthammer described it as “liberal arrogance.”

"This is exactly what conservatives have been saying for four years, what we're hearing now is the true voice of liberal arrogance," he said. "They believe this. They believe that the voters are stupid, as he said. And they believe that they know the right way, they have to lead the masses to the promise land and they can only do it by deception."

“And that's what he said openly,” he continued. “We wanted to get the bill. We didn't care about how we did it so we lied about everything. We lied about if you can keep the plan knowing that you can't keep your plan. We lied about the fact that this would be a transfer of wealth, a massive transfer of wealth because, as Gruber said, had they known that, it would never have passed. They lied about every aspect of this.

Krauthammer also took aim at the media for not being more active in showing the deception involved in the passage of legislation.

"I think that is what has been charged all along and it is a scandal of the media that this has to be discovered in the sixth year of the presidency rather than talked about at the time when it was obvious they were lying about all this,” he added. “The idea of it being a transfer of wealth was known from the beginning, but they got away with it."

Video at site

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/11/11/Krauthammer-ObamaCare-Architect-Remarks-True-Voice-of-Liberal-Arrogance
...transfer of wealth

If you actually look at the taxes involved, most of the transfer of wealth comes from those not so wealthy. It does hit businesses in the payroll tax department and the high income through investment tax increases, but look at the taxes:

Cadillac,
mandate "penalty,"
prescription drugs,
medical devices,
insurance premiums, and the big one...
Medicare.

Then, to top it off, the premiums for exchange policies are based on the healthy people in the pools paying for the unhealthy... the young who usually did not worry about having healthcare insurance.

Those targeted the most here are the younger participants in the exchange pools and the younger generation of workers.

Think about how the sets the young generation back deeper in the hole, the ones already struggling with high debt from education.... where they pay high tenured salaries to the professors that are the best of friends with Gruber, actually the ones he was talking to in the videos!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
Edited by kbp, Nov 12 2014, 08:36 AM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Mason
Nov 11 2014, 11:47 PM
.
No one is mentioning the lower payments to Doctors, which is going to make a certain percentage work strictly off of Cash and serve the wealthy.

No one is mentioning the quality of the care - and the people that don't see Doctors when the wait times and drive times rise as these Docs are removed from serving their former patients.

.
When thinking this through, I start with the fact we have a shortage of Doctors, especially GP's that see you first. The structure of policies nowadays often have networks. Where the shortage hits the hardest is in those that serve Medicare/Medicaid.

With there being such a large percentage of private coverage, most through employers sponsored plans, the professionals will stay focused on serving that group. The shift to having more on Medicaid and exchange plans, along with the growth in those old enough to use Medicare, overloads the limited number of doctors that will serve them. The biggest factor in "quality of care" will probably just be getting any care outside the ER. Maybe the hospitals need a second ER for the not so major of an illness or injury patients, sort of like the walk-in systems.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Mason
Nov 12 2014, 02:30 AM
.
The media hasn't made the connection between Gruber's comments and the other statements made by Obama and his team.

Another Obamacare architect said there is no reason to live past 75.

Obama himself said that Obamacare is designed to help many of the people opposing it, but they don't understand that.

And why are State Exchanges the only place to get subsidies (per the law):

http://youtu.be/34rttqLh12U


.
Just my suspicions here...

Obamacare had Medicaid Expansion that would take away 100% of the Medicaid funds used by any State that did not agree to go along with the Expansion. States must cooperate...

Next it had tax credits for the less fortunate, funded partly through tax penalties, both of which came only if States set up an exchange. States must cooperate....

To pass Obamacare, they only had Dem's, and that was possible only after arm twisting, FREE MONEY for a few, backdoor deals and NOT allowing any the time necessary to read the bill.

Since the vast majority involved anticipated States would cooperate, that they'd look bad to the people selecting only Medicaid and NOT getting tax credits for the less fortunate, I suspect they had hoped the outcome would then resemble a bi-partisan agreement through the cooperation to Republican Governors and the Legislators representing the people in those States. The 2010 CBO estimate included data that anticipated all 50 States would cooperate (which is evidently what the CBO was told to include by those asking for the estimated costs).

Using the incentives to cooperate and disincentives for not cooperating looked to have been a plan win the political game on a national level also.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

LTC8K6
Nov 12 2014, 07:53 AM
http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/11/yet-another-video-emerges-of-obamacare-architect-calling-americans-stupid-video/

Yet Another Video Emerges Of Obamacare Architect Calling Americans ‘Stupid’
Quote:
 
...a short 5-second clip of Gruber, saying the following, that a part of the Obamacare passed because “the American people are too stupid to understand the difference.” ...from a lecture Gruber gave...in October of last year"


I had not noticed the video was what I'd call recent, being as how Obamacare had become such a huge political problem. Gruber's Dem's friends had been "shellacked" in the 2010 election, 38 States did NOT establish an exchange, Barry had been writing Legislation through EO's to prevent political damage with delays.... Gruber is the one "too stupid to understand" WTH he was doing!

Thank you Rich Weinstein!
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Concerned
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
When thinking this through, I start with the fact we have a shortage of Doctors, especially GP's that see you first. The structure of policies nowadays often have networks. Where the shortage hits the hardest is in those that serve Medicare/Medicaid.

With there being such a large percentage of private coverage, most through employers sponsored plans, the professionals will stay focused on serving that group. The shift to having more on Medicaid and exchange plans, along with the growth in those old enough to use Medicare, overloads the limited number of doctors that will serve them. The biggest factor in "quality of care" will probably just be getting any care outside the ER. Maybe the hospitals need a second ER for the not so major of an illness or injury patients, sort of like the walk-in systems.


My GP just dropped all insurance except Medicare. She said an average doctor has 2500 patients and the government wanted them to increase it to 5000, so she now cut her practice to 800 patients offering a concierge-type service where you have no wait time, get right in to see the doctor, text and email access, 3 hour yearly checkups. $900 a year. Her husband is a doctor and did the same thing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown
.
My Doctor retired early.

I visited friiends / family last year and saw a sign in a Doctor's window saying - We do not accept Medicare.

This thing is really Wealth Redistribution at its core.

I can hear Obammy saying - Employers can give their employees great insurance - but they'll go broke doing it.

.
Edited by Mason, Nov 12 2014, 11:43 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Concerned
Nov 12 2014, 11:37 AM
Quote:
 
When thinking this through, I start with the fact we have a shortage of Doctors, especially GP's that see you first. The structure of policies nowadays often have networks. Where the shortage hits the hardest is in those that serve Medicare/Medicaid.

With there being such a large percentage of private coverage, most through employers sponsored plans, the professionals will stay focused on serving that group. The shift to having more on Medicaid and exchange plans, along with the growth in those old enough to use Medicare, overloads the limited number of doctors that will serve them. The biggest factor in "quality of care" will probably just be getting any care outside the ER. Maybe the hospitals need a second ER for the not so major of an illness or injury patients, sort of like the walk-in systems.


My GP just dropped all insurance except Medicare. She said an average doctor has 2500 patients and the government wanted them to increase it to 5000, so she now cut her practice to 800 patients offering a concierge-type service where you have no wait time, get right in to see the doctor, text and email access, 3 hour yearly checkups. $900 a year. Her husband is a doctor and did the same thing.
800 @ $900/year = $720,000/year. I guess that is enough to pay her and for OH. I suppose there are many outside testing fees, etc. Maybe that combined with a catastrophe type policy would work out (+ you pay penalty tax!).
Edited by kbp, Nov 12 2014, 02:46 PM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Quote:
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/10/obamacare-health-exchange-enrollees-to-fall-well-s/print/

Obamacare may not have enough enrollees to stay solvent

The administration on Monday said fewer than 10 million Americans will enroll in Obamacare's health exchanges this go-around, well short of the 13 million target congressional scorekeepers deemed critical to its economics, suggesting another rocky rollout in the law's second year of full operation.

[...]

The number of enrollees is key, because if too few take part in the exchanges, the pool of customers is too small, and it could skew the economics of Obamacare, forcing insurers to raise premiums and pushing even more people to forgo coverage, choosing to pay the tax penalty instead.

[...]
They were supposed to hit...
7 million in 2014,
13 million for 2015,
22 million in 2016,
24 million in 2017 and hang about there always.

The 3-R's was to have been like a profit-sharing to cover loss-sharing among all insurance companies, a transition plan that had government bailout as the backup plan.

How the pools are figured I do not know. Just for an example, a state may have 5 insurers, each offering 10 different policies scattered throughout the Bronze to Platinum plans. I not sure if each plan has a pool, each company per state has a pool, or if the individual companies figure a national pool.

I suppose if they never hit anything near the annual targets I listed above, and the 3-R's end 2016, the likely outcome is that Obamacare has more unhealthy participants v. healthy, when compared to what they had anticipated, so they will have failed. Failure here means prices go up and it costs the taxpayer more than anticipated per person Obamacare insures. Not sure why any insurance company would drop out if the government is paying most of the premiums.
.

Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Quote:
 
http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/11/gruber-now-accusing-gop-of-trying-to-confuse-people-about-obamacare/print/

Gruber Now Accusing GOP Of Trying To ‘Confuse People’ About Obamacare
Posted By Sarah Hurtubise

Jonathan Gruber, the Obamacare architect that admitted Obamacare only passed because politicians hid what was in it from the public, is now accusing the GOP of trying to “confuse people” about the law.

Gruber told Boston-area public broadcaster WGBH late Tuesday that the upcoming Supreme Court case which challenges whether Obamacare allows subsidies in federally-run exchanges is, in fact, a Republican attempt to confuse the American people.

“I think this comes to the master strategy of the Republican Party, which is to confuse people enough about the law so that they don’t understand the subsidies they’re getting are because of the law,” Gruber said.

Gruber’s comments are especially ironic in the aftermath of a 2013 video, uncovered by regular citizen Rich Weinstein, in which Gruber explains to a University of Pennsylvania audience that Democrats had to hide the actual cost of the health-care law from the public because of “the stupidity of the American voter.”

“Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” Gruber had said.

Gruber now opposes the challenges to the Obama administration’s rule on Obamacare subsidies, but he first attracted attention over the summer when Weinstein and bloggers John Sexton and Morgan Richmond discovered several tapes of Gruber explaining that Obamacare does actually restrict subsidies to state-run exchanges.

Gruber tried to brush aside his subsidy comments as a “speak-o.” He also told MSNBC’s Ronan Farrow earlier on Tuesday that he was speaking “off the cuff” in the latest video and regrets calling the American voters stupid.

“I apologize for the terms I used, I expressed myself very poorly,” Gruber said when asked about his comments, but stood by his point that Obamacare would not have passed had the public known that it would effectively redistribute money. The host, Emily Rooney, later joked about the revelations briefly before ending the segment and advised him not to tweet.

“I have certainly learned my lesson,” Gruber laughed.”Now I know I can not only not tweet, I can’t speak,” he lamented.
Gruber would like you to believe that all the videos out were tampered with, and also any more Rich Weinstein may have!
.


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/11/obamacare-year-two-sticker-shock-and-hundreds-of-thousands-losing-plans-video/print/

Obamacare Year Two: Sticker Shock And Hundreds Of Thousands Losing Plans [VIDEO]
Posted By Derek Hunter

The enrollment date for year two of Obamacare is Nov. 15. That’s the day people can start enrolling and re-enrolling in health plans for 2015. It’s also the day enrollees will find out what the plans are going to cost them. That, according to one insurance broker, is when customers will be in for some serious “sticker shock.”

National Journal’s Kristine Frazao reports, “Hundreds of thousands, if not more, will find themselves without medical insurance if they fail to sign up through a state exchange or healthcare.gov. People have just four weeks to get it done.”

Ed Kafes, an insurance broker in Maryland, told Frazao that when it comes to premiums “people will be in for sticker shock.” Prices in Kafes’ area are expected to rise as much as 20 percent.

And, Kafes tells Frazao, “The products are not what they’re used to. There’s more financial exposure after the deductible.”

The penalties for not buying government approved insurance are increasing this year as well. For an individual, the penalty increases from $95 to $325, and for a family of four, the increase is from $285 to $975.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kbp

Todd Ruger @ToddRuger

D.C. Circuit makes it official: Halbig challenge to health care law on hold until #SCOTUS decides King case



Posted Image
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Baldo
Member Avatar

I can't believe the utter arrogance of Gruber's statement. You would think he would have kept his mouth shut.

BUTTT NOOOOO!

The Arrogant Academic just had to say how smart he was and how stupid the American People were. He was bragging to an audience of Elites

But what he didn't say was the Lies & more Lies that Obama, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, and the Democratic whores in Congress used to sell it and how he was personally responsible for.

Just another effing elite Marxist who knows what is best for everybody below him.

And worse he got paid $400,000 to lie to the American People.
Edited by Baldo, Nov 12 2014, 07:28 PM.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Baldo
Member Avatar

When caught in a lie on camera what does Gruber do?

Lie some more!

Gruber Now Accusing GOP Of Trying To ‘Confuse People’ About Obamacare
by Wochit 0:40 mins


Jonathan Gruber, the Obamacare architect that admitted Obamacare only passed because politicians hid what was in it from the public, is now accusing the GOP of trying to “confuse people” about the law. Gruber told Boston-area public broadcaster WGBH late Tuesday that the upcoming Supreme Court case which challenges whether Obamacare allows subsidies in federally-run exchanges is, in fact, a Republican attempt to confuse the American people.

https://screen.yahoo.com/gruber-now-accusing-gop-trying-114357373.html


Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mason
Member Avatar
Parts unknown


MORE LIES!

Remember Obama said over and over it was NOT a tax and then his lawyer went before the court and said, of course, it's a Tax.




http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/white-house-gruber-comments-simple-not-true


.
Edited by Mason, Nov 12 2014, 09:52 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums. Reliable service with over 8 years of experience.
Learn More · Register for Free
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · LIESTOPPERS UNDERGROUND · Next Topic »
Add Reply